Buying the Jesus Legend

Posted by Anthony Sacramone on December 24, 2007, 2:04 PM

After you’ve bought this . . . and this . . . and this . . . and this thingee . . . definitely buy this.

In The Jesus Legend, Doctors Paul Rhodes Eddy, professor of biblical and theological studies at Bethel University, and Gregory A. Boyd, senior pastor of Woodland Hills Church in St. Paul, Minnesota, perform what amounts to an autopsy on the pet theories of the Enlightened higher-critics and Bultmanniacs who have wasted generations’ worth of time trying to disprove the veracity of the gospels in their vainglorious attempt to remake Jesus in their own image.

Eddy and Boyd have immersed themselves in the revisionist material and deconstruct, argument by argument, gimcrack conspiracy theory by gimcrack conspiracy theory, all the legendary “explanations” intended to prove the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ a mere legend. From “Paul was constructing a mystery religion” to the gospels are coded midrash/pesher texts to (my personal favorite) Mark modeled his gospel on Homer’s Odyssey–all are shown to be untenable in the light of current scholarship.

Eddy and Boyd go on to demonstrate how the supposed pagan influences on the fiercely monotheistic gospel writers are based more on wishful thinking and ignorance of first-century Judea, Samaria, and Galilee than on fact, and how many of these supposed influences were born centuries after the gospel writers lived and died, arguing for an influence going the other way. The authors also go into great detail about the nature of oral history and oral tradition, and how communities were quite conservative and guarded about mucking about with original source material.

As if that were not enough, Boyd and Eddy retire the tired wheeze about the ancients’ being illiterate, overly credulous dunces (the archaeological evidence alone proves that to be wrong) and invigorate Bauckham’s (and others’) work on Paul’s and the gospels’ reliance on eyewitness testimony (the kind of testimony still used in, say, twenty-first-century law courts).

While not arguing for an overly literalist interpretation of the biblical texts (whereby discrepancies are reconciled so that “two” magically equals “three”), and making room for the editing typically found in “oral composition,” the authors leave no doubt that the gospels are completely reliable in communicating the fundamentals of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection, and that the gospel writers were neither attempting to deceive or were themselves deceived.

Moreover, Eddy and Boyd marry accessible language with exhaustive, serious research, making The Jesus Legend the best one-volume debunking of the debunkers you could possibly give a college student, seminarian, or curious layperson.

When all is said and done, Spongian liberals and Dawkinsian New Atheists alike will be left lambasting orthodox Christians for adverting to pointy-headed scholarship instead of relying on good old-fashioned fideism. First science, now archaeology, ethnography, orality/literacy studies, and history—where’s a good neo-Gnostic or materialist to go for ammunition now that Christians have become cutting edge?

On second thought, forget the other junk I listed up top: Just buy this. Now! There are only forty-two shopping seconds left till Christmas . . .

Nativity Scenes

Posted by Amanda Shaw on December 24, 2007, 12:43 PM

Nativity scenes set the tone of Christmas. There are placid olive-wood ones, arranged in hushed stillness amid pine sprigs and juniper. There are bejeweled rainbow ones, frozen on hills of cotton batting and glinting merrily in the candlelight. There are illuminated plastic figures, the size of small children, that pop up in every suburban neighborhood—cookie-cutter crèches decorating cookie-cutter houses. I’ve even seen the sort that blink on and off—an egregiously unabashed way of flashing the joy of the season. There are clay crèches and crocheted crèches; crystal and cornhusk; big and little; bright and bland; modest and fantastic.

My family has at least as many nativity scenes as we have personalities. But one of my favorites has long been the doll-house crèche. It’s not a Victorian relic or a dainty and detailed plaything. The little people wear plastic snap-on garb and printed smiles. But the child’s imagination, free from practicality and preconceptions, can bring all that to life. Perfect for long hours of play while mom decorates the house and cooks the Christmas roast.

In those days a decree went out . . . But there’s a problem: Scripture provides a rather sparse script. Luke devotes less than half a chapter to that first Christmas, Matthew only narrates the adoration of the magi (omitting exciting details like their names or nationalities), Mark fast-forwards to the adult life of Christ, and John’s prologue, magnificent as it is, does not lend himself to doll-house reenactment: The Word became flesh, and dwelt among us. But anyone who listens to a child arranging the shepherds and kings—choirs of angels suspended from the bookshelf by scotch-tape and dental floss, and a menagerie of animals grazing on the carpet—realizes how much he’s missed, and how rich is the child’s sight: Thou hast hidden these things from the wise and the prudent and revealed them to my little ones.

Of course, the three wisemen did not worship alongside the shepherds. For that matter, we don’t really know that there were three, despite the fifth-century decree of Leo the Great and the artistic witness of almost every Adoration of the Magi before and since. Gold, frankincense, and myrrh were their gifts, but who is to say that the three richly-clad bodies—brought from Persia to Milan by St. Helena and then carried in the twelfth century to Cologne—had anything to do with the wisemen of old? The bodies are clad in damask and silk, woven in the East about 2000 years ago, but what of that? Science and history, or rather the science of history, falls silent.

And what of the requisite ox and ass, humbly framing the crib? The ox knows its master, writes the prophet Isaiah, and the ass its master’s crib; but Israel does not know, my people do not understand. Unfortunately, the gospels forget to mention these lowing and braying onlookers. Or—maybe—they weren’t there. We simply don’t know about the ox and the ass, the camels and sheep, Casper, Melchior, and Balthazar, the astronomical details of the star, or even the little drummer boy. And we don’t need to know. The Christmas story is about the coming of Christ; it is about the Son of God, dwelling in our midst, in our hearts, and in our sight.

And yet, if Christmas celebrates the Word made flesh, there is something fitting about fleshing out the gospel account, so to speak—about bringing the biblical word to life. Children know how to wonder and dream and tell stories. They do it in the corner behind the Christmas tree, where the Santa Claus ornament joins the shepherd dolls in adoration before the Christ-Child, and the wooden Christmas mouse peeps wide-eyed from the toy stable. They worry that the mouse has nothing to bring the babe, that there’s not enough straw in the manger, that swaddling clothes look chilly for a winter’s night—and no one needs to explain that we don’t really know what day or season it all came to pass, and that there is certainly no mouse in Scripture. Little hands nudge the ox and ass close to the manger, so that the animals can warm the baby with their soft breath. But, their elders wink and nod, of course it’s only make-believe.

In a sense, though, the child’s spiritual imagination is also that of the poet and the artist and the mystic. The tradition of nativity scenes was popularized by St. Francis of Assisi in the thirteenth century. It was 1223, to be precise, when the rough-clad friar assisted at a torchlight Mass in Greccio, Italy—with a manger for an altar, and an ox and ass attending. Francis describes the dream-vision that was his inspiration: He stood before the manger and lifted up the Christ-Child, who woke in his arms and smiled. It was this living presence, intimate and profound, that he wanted to share with his people.

The custom of the crèche—living at first, and sculpted soon after—spread throughout Italy, up into Poland, over into France. In the Provence region, especially, the practice of making nativity figures engrained itself deeply into the local culture. Santons, they are called, little saints. And as anyone who has seen a Santon crèche knows well, the figures are not just part of the culture: Culture is part of the figures. There are the usual players, for sure, but also the dogs and chickens, horses and doves. There’s the rooster who helps the angel Boufarèu (“Big-cheeks”) blow his trumpet to awaken the town, and there’s the washerwoman, bringing fresh linens for the mother and child. There’s the gypsy woman with her tambourine, come to play for the babe, and her husband with his performing bear.

There’s the shepherd Gabriel, whose dog has just died and who’s afraid to approach the manger with tears still in his eyes. Miraculously, the animal comes back to life, and he offers it as his gift. “No,” the blessed Mother responds with maternal care; “you keep the dog; you need it to guard your sheep.” Each figure has a story, each story is personal

Apocryphal excess? Distracting clutter? Maybe. Or maybe not—Nativity scenes set the tone of Christmas, and here the whole town takes part. The animals and the outcasts, the young and the old: Each brings the little he has to offer, the work of his hands, his daily life, his piddly worries and cares and pursuits and pastimes. And as the Christ-Child smiled at the simple friar of Assisi, he smiles at each of them: I reveal these things to my little ones.

Poets and artists and mystics glimpse through the child’s eyes. Take, for instance, the ox and the ass. Though absent from the gospels, some of the earliest Christian carvings, catacomb-frescos, and manuscripts depict the humble creatures gazing with mute love on their infant master. Origen, in the third century, first mentioned the ox and ass in his commentary on Luke, and Ambrose and other Church Fathers followed suit. The fifth-century Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew said that “the ox and ass, with him between them, worshipped unceasingly.” And St. Bonaventure—with the scholar’s intellect and child’s imagination—described the scene in loving detail: The ox and ass, with bended knees, and with their heads placed over the manger, breathed upon him, as if they were gifted with reason, and knew that their warm breath would be of service to an infant so slightly protected from the severity of the season.

The ox knows its master, and the ass its master’s crib. The ox and the ass appear and reappear in early nativity art: a manuscript page, a painted panel, a sarcophagus carving. Curiously, they are often paired opposite the magi bearing fine gifts and wearing fancy robes: the mute and the mighty, the lowly and the learned. The whole span of creation bows down in wonder. It’s a homely scene, to be sure, and the drab russet ox and drabber grey donkey always seem to clash with the gilded angel behind, and gilded wisemen beside, and gilded star overhead. Even the glitteriest crèches have a hard time dressing up the twin beasts, and perhaps that’s why they take the place of honor—one at the Child’s right hand, the other at his left. The least of these shall be the first.

Israel does not know, my people do not understand, Isaiah tells us, and how right he is. But the nativity scene, with all its quotidian clutter, imaginative additions, and tender detail, reminds us what we have forgotten. The Christmas story is about the coming of Christ—the Son of God entering our minds and hearts and lives. We see Him in seeing his little ones: the gift of the least of these.

Hail, O Gardener of the Gardener of Life!

Posted by Nathaniel Peters on December 24, 2007, 12:03 PM

True devotion to Mary, as Fr. Neuhaus recently reminded us, always points us to Christ. Like most converts to Catholicism or Orthodoxy, Marian devotion has taken some getting used to for me. I therefore found Frederica Mathewes-Green’s The Lost Gospel of Mary: The Mother of Jesus in Three Ancient Texts very helpful, and particularly suitable for Advent. Aside from the sideswipes at the Western church that one finds too often in Orthodox writing, the book a gem for those seeking to learn more about Mary from the primary texts of sacred tradition. Frederica has translated The Proto-Evangelium of James, the Sub Tuum Praesidium, and the Akathist Hymn of St. Romanos to the Theotokos, these being excellent examples of pious legend about Mary, prayer to her, and hymns of praise in her honor. I found the latter especially beautiful not only in its imagery but in the way it pointed to Christ as well. A free translation of the Akathist Hymn can be found here, but a sample is below. As we contemplate the coming of Christ and the actions of his Mother leading up to it, this hymn can lead us to a better love of both.

Pregnant with God, the Virgin hastened to Elizabeth, her unborn child rejoiced, immediately knowing her embrace. Bouncing and singing, he cried out to the Mother of God:

Hail, O Tendril whose Bud shall not wilt!
Hail, O Soil whose Fruit shall not perish!
Hail, O Tender of mankind’s loving Tender!
Hail, O Gardener of the Gardener of Life!
Hail, O Earth who yielded abundant mercies!
Hail, O Table full-laden with appeasement!
Hail, for you have greened anew the pastures of delight!
Hail, for you have prepared a haven for the souls!
Hail, acceptable Incense of Prayer!
Hail, Expiation of the whole universe!
Hail, O you Favor of God to mortal men!
Hail, O you Trust of mortals before God!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!

Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!

Britain is a Catholic Country

Posted by Robert T. Miller on December 24, 2007, 12:03 PM

First, I want to follow Jody in congratulating Tony Blair, who has been a good friend to this nation, on his conversion to Catholicism.

I am also happy to congratulate Mr. Blair’s country, the United Kingdom, on its conversion to Catholicism. Yes, you read that correctly. What I mean is that, according to this story in the Telegraph, “Britain has become a ‘Catholic Country’” because “Roman Catholics have overtaken Anglicans as the country’s dominant religious group. More people attend Mass every Sunday than worship with the Church of England.” Hence, “the established Church has lost its place as the nation’s most popular Christian denomination after four centuries of unrivaled influence following the Reformation.”

When you read more carefully, however, it turns out the picture is not quite so rosy, even for the Catholics. It turns out that 861,000 persons in Britain attend mass every Sunday while only 852,000 turn up for Anglican services. The population of Britain is about 60.7 million souls, so even the combined weekly attendance of the Catholic Church and the Anglican Church aggregates only 2.8 percent of the population.

Moreover, the Catholics numbers have surpassed the Anglican ones only because, although attendance at Anglican services has fallen 20 percent since 2000, attendance at mass has fallen only 13 percent. The difference seems to be explained by an influx of Catholic immigrants from Africa and Eastern Europe; this has reduced the rate of decrease in the Catholic numbers. So attendance at both churches is declining rapidly; it’s just that Anglicans are even worse off than the Catholics.

The Rt. Rev. Crispian Hollis, the Catholic Bishop of Portsmouth, has a curious take on this. He says that “these figures are encouraging. It shows that the [Catholic] Church is no longer seen as on the fringes of society, but in fact is now at the heart of British life.” Well, sure, if an organization with committed members totaling 1.4 percent of the population (and many of these recent immigrants who may not remain in the country for long) can be at the heart of a nation’s life.

The Anglican clergy, too, seems to misunderstand the significance of these numbers. Says the Church of England’s Rt. Rev. Graham Cray, “It isn’t a competition. I’m delighted to see all the Christian denominations flourishing.” I appreciate the ecumenical sentiment, but that’s quite a strange definition of flourishing you got there, Rt. Rev.

And a Very Merry Gulag to You

Posted by Anthony Sacramone on December 24, 2007, 11:54 AM

Let me see if I understand the T-shirt on the right correctly:

Don’t buy that Christmas gift and thereby perpetuate the consumerist mentality.

Do obliterate the lumpenproletariat, terrorize the masses, and establish a one-party dictatorship.

All by Christmas morning?

I went out and bought 11 more things just for spite . . .