Wow, this site gives 684%! That’s great effort!
Well, actually 684.4%… but, hey, who counts?
Does this site contain no due diligence? Doesn’t that mean the site makes you vulnerable to civil action? And speaking of due diligence, ought you not post margins of error with your statistics?
So, here is case of art imitating science…
A candid look at the site would suggest that it does not even contain undue diligence.
Although building a table with raw HTML code is not as easy as it looks.
A brilliant sage once stated (about 15 seconds ago), “building character is much like building a table. If not properly constructed, it will collapse under the slightest weight”.
Those are dangerously high levels of sophisticated humor, which is known to the state of California to cause insufferableness.
These categories are not mutually exclusive.
For starters, I’d say that 0.3% of content is sophisticated humor AND libel. The more libelous, the funnier.
There are whole other categories that did not make it in the table, because they are just subsets of other categories. What I mean is, 215% of content is English of the Future, but there is no need to say so, since it has already been counted as Filler + Ambiguities + Implausibility.
By the way, what site are we talking about? I assumed it was CNN Headline News.
No wait, now I’m sure this is the content breakdown of healthcare dot gov.
Mail (will not be published) (required)