By: First Things » Blog Archive » Reducing Poverty by Reducing Children, Part III

Fri, 08 May 2009 18:44:46 +0000

[...] Earlier I mentioned parts I and II of Daniel Patrick Maloney’s series at Public Discourse on reducing poverty by reducing the number of poor children. In part III, Maloney, a former FT associate editor, examines the Medicaid policies that result from this belief and how they could be changed. A sample: In 1993, the Clinton Administration approved a plan whereby states could expand Medicaid’s free family planning services to those who were too rich to be eligible for Medicaid. There was a catch, however—a state could have access to Medicaid’s contraception money only if it could promise that it would save the government money in the long run by “averting births” of children who were likely to be a drain on the welfare system. The Guttmacher Institute had been publishing papers since the 1970s arguing that averting the births of the poor would save money set aside for helping the poor; now the federal government was demanding that the states adopt this perverse argument in order to have access to more of Medicaid’s millions. . . . [...]

Comments on: Reducing Poverty by Reducing Children, Part II

By: First Things » Blog Archive » Reducing Poverty by Reducing Children, Part III