Comments on: Bishops Back D’Arcy http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/06/23/bishops-back-darcy/ A First Things Blog Wed, 22 May 2013 14:58:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Antony http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/06/23/bishops-back-darcy/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Antony Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:56:24 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=4379#comment-618 Pedants. You know very well which university they were talking about.

For its part, the University of Notre Dame should reflect more deeply on the nature of Our Lady, who, finding herself in a certain situation, is well-known for saying Yes.

I have little doubt as to what she thinks of Mr. Obama and his complete submission to the likes of Planned Parenthood.

]]> By: Mal Johnson http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/06/23/bishops-back-darcy/comment-page-1/#comment-584 Mal Johnson Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:28:50 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=4379#comment-584 Good grief! Do not even the bishops know the proper name of the University of Notre Dame?

]]> By: Aric http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/06/23/bishops-back-darcy/comment-page-1/#comment-558 Aric Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:08:05 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=4379#comment-558 Ah, leave it to the bishops to express solidarity regarding “Notre Dame University,” which does not exist (or, if it does, at least has never caused scandal granting an honorary degree to the president). Why should anyone trust them on large matters, when they prove themselves incompetent on small things? Surely it is objectively a mortal sin to go about one’s vocation with such sloppiness that one does not even bother to name the target of one’s condemnation correctly.

]]>