SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, July 10, 2009, 9:44 PM

Ryan Sayre Patrico brings up a controversy here that is beginning to buzz around Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It concerns a statement she makes in an interview to be published this Sunday in the NYT Magazine, in which she opines that she once thought Roe v Wade was about stopping the growth “in populations we don’t want too many of.”

Patrico didn’t allege that she agreed with that supposed “purpose.” But others have, and I think it doesn’t stick. I explain why over at Secondhand Smoke.

Ginsburg does get into policy, arguing strongly in favor of expanding access to abortion to poor women. That is clearly inappropriate. For that, she should recuse herself from every future abortion case that comes before the court.

3 Comments

    Francis Beckwith
    July 10th, 2009 | 10:18 pm

    Thanks for posting this Wesley. I almost posted something similar this evening. You beat me to it.

    Just like you, I did not think one could reasonably claim from this published quote that Justice Ginsberg agreed with what she thought was the purpose for Roe v. Wade.

    Wesley J. Smith
    July 11th, 2009 | 2:10 pm

    Francis (and anybody else): Is there anything that can be done about her policy pronouncements?

    Cornelius
    July 11th, 2009 | 9:30 pm

    It’s spelled Ginsburg, not Ginsberg.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact