Who said that? The Family Research Council? The Heritage Foundation? American Interprise Institute? Nope. Try Time magazine :
There is no other single force causing as much measurable hardship and human misery in this country as the collapse of marriage. It hurts children, it reduces mothers financial security, and it has landed with particular devastation on those who can bear it least: the nations underclass . . . .
The reason for these appeals to lasting unions is simple: on every single significant outcome related to short-term well-being and long-term success, children from intact, two-parent families outperform those from single-parent households. Longevity, drug abuse, school performance and dropout rates, teen pregnancy, criminal behavior and incarceration if you can measure it, a sociologist has; and in all cases, the kids living with both parents drastically outperform the others.
Few things hamper a child as much as not having a father at home. As a feminist, I didnt want to believe it, says Maria Kefalas, a sociologist who studies marriage and family issues and co-authored a seminal book on low-income mothers called Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. Women always tell me, I can be a mother and a father to a child, but its not true. Growing up without a father has a deep psychological effect on a child. The mom may not need that man, Kefalas says, but her children still do. . . . .
The fundamental question we must ask ourselves at the beginning of the century is this: What is the purpose of marriage? Is it given the game-changing realities of birth control, female equality and the fact that motherhood outside of marriage is no longer stigmatized simply an institution that has the capacity to increase the pleasure of the adults who enter into it? If so, we might as well hold the wake now: there probably arent many people whose idea of 24-hour-a-day good times consists of being yoked to the same romantic partner, through bouts of stomach flu and depression, financial setbacks and emotional upsets, until after many a long decade, one or the other eventually dies in harness.
Or is marriage an institution that still hews to its old intention and function to raise the next generation, to protect and teach it, to instill in it the habits of conduct and character that will ensure the generations own safe passage into adulthood? Think of it this way: the current generation of children, the one watching commitments between adults snap like dry twigs and observing parents who simply cant be bothered to marry each other and who hence drift in and out of their childrens lives thats the generation who will be taking care of us when we are old.
(via GetReligion )