Comments on: Re: Cheering and Fearing Science http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/08/06/re-cheering-and-fearing-science/ A First Things Blog Sat, 25 May 2013 03:12:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Joe Carter http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/08/06/re-cheering-and-fearing-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1744 Joe Carter Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:52:03 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=6392#comment-1744 I couldn’t decide if it was infamous or noteworthy so I decided just to leave it adjective-free.

]]> By: GeronimoRumplestiltskin http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/08/06/re-cheering-and-fearing-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1742 GeronimoRumplestiltskin Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:49:12 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=6392#comment-1742 Dovetailing on Matt’s thought, how about “noteworthy”?

(After a second read-through, it appears that Mr. Carter expunged the “infamous” from his description of the speech, replacing it with no adjective at all.)

]]> By: Matt http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/08/06/re-cheering-and-fearing-science/comment-page-1/#comment-1739 Matt Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:02:07 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=6392#comment-1739 Joe, why describe Crichton’s 2003 speech as “infamous”? Wouldn’t “famous” be about right–or maybe a more neutral “notorious”?

]]>