MEMBER LOGIN




Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

First Thoughts
Archive

Monthly


« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, September 4, 2009, 12:03 AM
Joe Carter

So you know how when you’re coming out of the grocery store and someone says “Want to sign our petition” and you say “What’s it about?” and they say “It’s about getting to the truth about 9/11.” and you think “Well, I like truth but my my ice cream is melting and I don’t have time to read it, so yeah, okay . . .” and you sign the petition and then five years later the President appoints you a czar and then someone says “You’re a Truther!” and you’re like “Waaa. . .?”

Yeah, well, that happened to Van Jones too:

Van Jones, the Special Advisor for Green Jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality, is Number 46 of the petitioners from the so-called “Truther” movement which suggests that people in the administration of President George W. Bush “may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.”

In a statement issued Thursday evening Jones said of “the petition that was circulated today, I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever.”

He did not explain how his name came to be on the petition. A source said Jones did not carefully review the language in the petition before agreeing to add his name.

In case you haven’t heard of this guy before, he’s the one who started a group “rooted in Marxism and Leninism” fifteen years ago and then in February called Republicans [expletive deleted] and said “some of us who are not Barack Hussein Obama are going to have to start getting a little bit uppity.” So this would be strike three.

Charles Krauthammer, Mara Liasson and Steve Hayes, all predict Jones will be gone by Tuesday. I have two predictions of my own: (1) Jones will start reading the petitions he signs, and (2) someone at the White House is going to add “Do a Google Search” on their Czar Background Check Checklist.

(Via: Hot Air)

4 Comments

    TomJohnson
    September 4th, 2009 | 7:03 am

    Wasn’t it that horrible Glenn Beck who brought Van Jones to our attention?

    Joe Carter
    September 4th, 2009 | 8:58 am

    TomJohnson: Wasn’t it that horrible Glenn Beck who brought Van Jones to our attention?

    No, actually it was Michelle Malkin who first brought Jones to the public’s attention. And Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit was the one who dug up the Truther story. As usual happens, the cable shows simply publicize the work of bloggers.

    Tweets that mention Van Truther and the Petition » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
    September 4th, 2009 | 2:38 pm

    [...] this page was mentioned by Londiniensis (@londiniensis), Mollie Hemingway (@mzhemingway), First Things (@rofters) and others. [...]

    Tournefort
    September 6th, 2009 | 5:34 pm

    “someone at the White House is going to add “Do a Google Search” on their Czar Background Check Checklist.”

    This suggests the White House didn’t know about, and disagrees with, Van Jones’ background. I don’t believe that’s the case.

    Valerie Jarrett, profiled at the NYT Magazine as “The Ultimate Obama Insider”, said this about Jones:

    “JARRETT:. You guys know Van Jones? [Applause. Moderator injects: "This is his house apparently."]

    JARRETT: Oooh. Van Jones, alright! So, Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We were watching him, uh, really, he’s not that old, for as long as he’s been active out in Oakland. And all the creative ideas he has. And so now, we have captured that. And we have all that energy in the White House.”

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/09/03/van-jones-valerie-jarrett-barack-obama-do-it-yourself-vetting/

    “We were watching him, uh, really, he’s not that old, for as long as he’s been active out in Oakland”

    Sounds like the White House knew exactly what they were getting (and agreed with) when they hired Van Jones.