MEMBER LOGIN




Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

First Thoughts
Archive

Monthly


« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Monday, November 9, 2009, 9:10 AM
Joe Carter

A new report reveals that members of Congress are just like the rest of us . . . only much, much richer:

Two-hundred-and-thirty-seven members of Congress are millionaires. That’s 44 percent of the body – compared to about 1 percent of Americans overall.

CRP says California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa is the richest lawmaker on Capitol Hill, with a net worth estimated at about $251 million. Next in line: Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), worth about $244.7 million; Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), worth about $214.5 million; Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), worth about $209.7 million; and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), worth about $208.8 million.

All told, at least seven lawmakers have net worths greater than $100 million, according to the Center’s 2008 figures.

“Many Americans probably have a sense that members of Congress aren’t hurting, even if their government salary alone is in the six figures, much more than most Americans make,” said CRP spokesman Dave Levinthal. “What we see through these figures is that many of them have riches well beyond that salary, supplemented with securities, stock holdings, property and other investments.”

I’ve never been one to begrudge representatives their “six-figure” salaries. When the pay is set low for elected officials, the only people who can afford to run for office are the independently wealthy (the Texas state legislature, for example, pays representatives $600 a month—which ensures that the only legislators are rich people). Campaign finance laws have also made it almost impossible for anyone who is not already rich to even run for office. Indeed, its rather surprising that less than half are millionaires.

What is even more shocking, however, is that an institution that wields so much power over our nation’s economy is comprised of people who can’t figure out how to make money. Perhaps its shouldn’t be surprising that our country is in debt when our own legislators have low net worths.

Take, for example, Joe Biden. He joined the Senate in 1973 and has made more than $100,000 a year since 1991. So how does he only have a net worth of $27,000? And how is it possible for five legislators (Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.), Rep. Harry Teague (D-N.M.), Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), Rep. John Salazar (D-Colo.), and Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.)) to have a net worth of less than zero?

Let’s hope Nancy Pelosi keeps these financially incompetent folks away from the Budget committee.

7 Comments

    Tweets that mention You Probably Have More Money Than Joe Biden » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
    November 9th, 2009 | 10:05 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Noor, Danny Dunmore. Danny Dunmore said: You Probably Have More Money Than Joe Biden: … however, is that an institution that wields so much power over.. http://bit.ly/49CXev [...]

    bob
    November 9th, 2009 | 10:19 am

    IN New Hampshire our State Reps make only $200 a year plus mileage. Pericles would be shaking his head. How can you have democracy when not everyone can participate?

    Tweets that mention You Probably Have More Money Than Joe Biden » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog -- Topsy.com
    November 9th, 2009 | 10:28 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Traffic Machine and Joshua Maher, Charles L. Charles L said: You Probably Have More Money Than Joe Biden http://bit.ly/1f7C5z [...]

    Brian
    November 9th, 2009 | 3:00 pm

    A few years ago I remember reading that Charlie Rangel was obviously an honest and dedicated public servant because after so many years in office he had such a modest amount of personal wealth. Of course, now we know he was a massively corrupt and lying tax cheat. I see no reason to doubt the same thing is true for some of these other jokers. Also, I’d bet that many of them funnel assets to family members in order to hide them from their pathetic “oversight” committees that are farcical anyway.

    Jesse
    November 9th, 2009 | 3:46 pm

    Alcee Hastings is probably still paying his lawyers from his impeachment proceedings when he was a federal judge.

    Jim Smith
    November 9th, 2009 | 9:04 pm

    The wealth of Jane Harman is probably vastly underestimated. When I ran against her in 2006, our research indicated that her family wealth, mainly from Harman International and worldwide real estate put her in the select billionaires club. While the depression may have cut into her bootom line, it usually hits the super-rich less hard than it does the working stiff. The figure listed on your report is likely only her personal wealth.

    jim connell
    November 22nd, 2009 | 5:19 pm

    HOW CAN JOE BIDEN HAVE A NET WORTH OF LESS THAN $100M. HE IS REPUTED TO LIVE IN A MANSION. THAT SEEMS LIKE A CONTRADICTION OF FACTS.