<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sense and Modern Sensibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/12/04/sense-and-modern-sensibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/12/04/sense-and-modern-sensibility/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail F</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2009/12/04/sense-and-modern-sensibility/comment-page-1/#comment-5670</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=10180#comment-5670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article, and a curious one -- because to me the idea of reading Jane Austin without paying attention to her moral points is a bizarre one. Why would you do that?

Although I suppose some people must. That is really what drove me crazy about the newest film of &quot;Pride and Prejudice.&quot; In the book, Jane is &quot;too&quot; good -- but that is what Elizabeth loves and admires about her. In the movie she&#039;s rather a simpleton, and in the end Elizabeth gets her to say something bad about her future sisters-in-law, which is supposed to be a triumph. Elizabeth is a more sympathetic character than Jane, but she herself knows that she is NOT as good as Jane and that that is a fault, not a good thing.

When I first read her novels I was in my 30s. I was delighted at the end of &quot;Sense and Sensibility,&quot; which was not at all what I expected. I can&#039;t imagine anyone writing a book today with an end like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting article, and a curious one &#8212; because to me the idea of reading Jane Austin without paying attention to her moral points is a bizarre one. Why would you do that?</p>
<p>Although I suppose some people must. That is really what drove me crazy about the newest film of &#8220;Pride and Prejudice.&#8221; In the book, Jane is &#8220;too&#8221; good &#8212; but that is what Elizabeth loves and admires about her. In the movie she&#8217;s rather a simpleton, and in the end Elizabeth gets her to say something bad about her future sisters-in-law, which is supposed to be a triumph. Elizabeth is a more sympathetic character than Jane, but she herself knows that she is NOT as good as Jane and that that is a fault, not a good thing.</p>
<p>When I first read her novels I was in my 30s. I was delighted at the end of &#8220;Sense and Sensibility,&#8221; which was not at all what I expected. I can&#8217;t imagine anyone writing a book today with an end like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
