SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Wednesday, December 30, 2009, 9:00 AM

Over on Evangel, Paul McCain republishes an article by Pastor Peter Speckhard, nephew of Fr. Neuhaus, advocating for the institution of temple prostitution. Fortunately, the piece can still be considered satire (though that will likely change in the next few years):

What are the biggest problems, practical and theological, that Lutheran churches in America face today? I would submit the following:

—Inability to retain or reach out to young, single people, especially men. Think about it—on a typical Sunday in a typical Lutheran church, how many 28-year-old single men are sitting in the pews? How might we draw them in? What are their felt needs?

[ . . . ]

—Declining revenue. Especially in a tough economy, we need new and creative ways to raise money if we’re adequately going to fund critical ministries such as feeding the hungry or blanketing Africa with condoms.

[ . . . ]

Now imagine all those problems solved with one simple innovation. The answer: temple prostitution.

I know, I know. Outrageous and offensive. I can hear readers already dismissing the idea out of hand. And I admit that we may not be ready for it quite yet. But please hear me out on this.

First off, let’s address the common objections. Sure, there are a handful of Bible verses that might seem to condemn the practice. But all the condemnation of temple prostitution involves pagan practices or worship of false gods. The objectionable thing is the idolatry, not the physical act itself. Sanctified, faithful prostitution in service of the true God is a new thing. The Biblical writers never foresaw or contemplated sanctified, faithful, God-pleasing prostitution in the churches and thus never wrote about it. Attempts to find a Biblical injunction against the practice therefore fall short.

Secondly, let’s not cherry-pick verses selectively. We don’t stone disobedient children to death. We don’t refrain from pork or sodomy merely because this or that verse says we should. We have to look at the whole Biblical witness in light of the freedom we have in Christ. For example, God ordered Hosea to marry a prostitute. Such Biblical precedent offers interpretive nuance to seemingly black-and-white prohibitions.

Read more . . .

3 Comments

    John
    December 30th, 2009 | 10:02 am

    The sad thing is….many churches and some Catholic theologians aren’t too far from taking this satire as a serious proposal worth looking into for implementation.

    After all…. ordaining an opennly promiscuous man or woman, proud of their promiscuity says what, exactly, about that church’s understanding of sin, the body’s dignity, human acts, individual and communal scandal, or examplars in the education and moral formation of the young?

    Using the old “but why not?” argument where by ANY action that’s novel is automatically endowed with innocence until exhaustively proven harmful and then subject to lawsuits and condemnation in the ‘proper’ journals…. quite a lot of ‘experimentation’ has occured.

    Seems to me the ground work has already been laid. Women (and men) are told that sex is vital to health. Celibacy and chastity is old fashioned, harmful even. They’re told contraception, abortion, and self-pleasuring is OK…. that marriage is a fluid and man-made institution… that one must never judge another’s actions….but at the same time oddly, pedophila is bad but it’s OK for children to ‘explore their sexuality’ at an ever younger age!

    In this liberal or libertine enviroment is not prostitution the next logical step? I’m shocked it hasn’t already happened. I firmly believe it’s coming in the next 5 years.

    Wednesday Highlights | Pseudo-Polymath
    December 30th, 2009 | 10:16 am

    [...] unclear on what Jeremiah or one of the 12 literary prophets might offer regarding that suggestion, but I suggest they might not remain [...]

    Stones Cry Out - If they keep silent… » Things Heard: e99v2
    December 30th, 2009 | 10:18 am

    [...] unclear on what Jeremiah or one of the 12 literary prophets might offer regarding that suggestion, but I suggest they might not remain [...]

=