Bart Stupak tells Fox News that, as a “guesstimate,” he thinks the Democrats are at least 16 votes short of passing the health-care bill: “I’d be surprised if they have 200 votes.”
One trouble for Pelosi seems to be that, this time around, she can’t accommodate Stupak and the pro-life Democrats, because she can’t believably assure them that the Senate will accept and adopt an abortion-funding ban. If Stupak is right, this is a curious turn: The fact that there is not a single serious pro-life Democrat in the Senate means that the House won’t trust the Senate on the issue, which means that the health-care bill could fail. If Harry Reid and Bob Casey had held their supposedly pro-life line on abortion, the Democrats would be much further along in health-care reform.
Is Stupak right about the aye votes in his whip count? My count runs higher, but, then, he does this for a living.
Of course, Nancy Pelosi does it for a living, too. And it’s hard to believe that she would put her party through these additional weeks of agony—keeping the issue on the front page day after day, ginning up more and more angry opposition—if she didn’t think she could eventually get the votes.





March 16th, 2010 | 10:15 am
“if she didn’t think she could eventually get the votes.”
Nancy seems to operate on the assumption that everyone has a price, even the Catholic hierarchy.
March 16th, 2010 | 12:23 pm
Maybe Nancy Pelosi’s Lenten lesson is that there are limits to even HER will when He wills otherwise.
What do you bet that, if the bill fails, she will still think that it is others who should be penitent?
March 16th, 2010 | 10:06 pm
We are near the high-water mark of 60′s liberalism. Scott Brown in Massachusetts, the coming mid-term elections–If they don’t get it now they never will. There can be no tactical retreat because there is no ,”next time,” for them. Maybe for the next generation, but not in their time of power.
Pelosi, Obama, at al will Go For Broke
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact