SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Saturday, April 24, 2010, 3:04 PM

In the latest issue of The Weekly Standard, Joseph Bottum has an essay on anti-Catholicism and the obsession over the scandals raging in Europe:

The day the Antichrist is ripped from his papal throne, true religion will guide the world. Or perhaps it’s the day the last priest is gutted, and his entrails used to strangle the last king, as Voltaire demanded. Yes, that’s when we will see at last the reign of bright, clean, enlightened reason—the release of mankind from the shadows of medieval superstition. War will end. The proletariat will awaken from its opiate dream. The oppression of women will stop. And science at last will be free from the shackles of Rome.

For almost 500 years now, Catholicism has been an available answer, a mystical key, to that deep, childish, and existentially compelling question: Why aren’t we there yet? Why is progress still unfinished? Why is promise still unfulfilled? Why aren’t we perfect? Why aren’t we changed?

Despite our rejection of the past, the future still hasn’t arrived. Despite our advances, corruption continues. It needs an explanation. It requires a response. And in every modernizing movement—from Protestant Reformers to French Revolutionaries, Communists to Freudians, Temperance Leaguers and suffragettes to biotechnologists and science-fiction futurists—someone in despair eventually stumbles on the answer: We have been thwarted by the Catholic Church.

Read more . . .

6 Comments

    Nathalie Reiner
    April 24th, 2010 | 5:06 pm

    I would have loved to see this piece in the pages of First Things.

    CM Collins
    April 24th, 2010 | 7:57 pm

    “…and, God knows, the history of Catholicism has plenty of anti-Semitic sins to expiate.”

    Do Jewish magazines rag on their own history like this?

    R. Saler
    April 24th, 2010 | 9:50 pm

    Isn’t the quote about the last king being strangled by the entrails of the last priest generally attributed to Diderot, rather than Voltaire?

    Burke Dennings
    April 25th, 2010 | 11:03 am

    I agree with Nathalie. Why was this not in First Things? Isn’t that where Mr. Bottum works?

    SteveM
    April 25th, 2010 | 1:14 pm

    Agree with Burke and Nathalie above. Especially because The neo-conservative Weekly Standard is the content link.

    The Joe Carter entry below this one is a link to a National Review blog interview between Katherine Lopez and Mary Eberstadt. Lopez conflates religion and politics explicitly by referring to Right and Left. However the topic is atheism, not political affinity. Doesn’t Catholicism supposedly transcend political labels?

    So is FT morphing into the Catholic arm of the neo-conservative movement with these selective linkages? Does it want to be?

    (I’m guessing the answer is yes on both counts. Which is a shame.)

    Ellyn
    April 26th, 2010 | 1:19 pm

    As a companion to this essay, you all may be interested in the following article which meshes quite well with it:

    http://www.wordonfire.org/WoF-Blog/WoF-Blog/April-2010/Analysis-Scandal-and-the-God-of-the-Victims.aspx

    Another astute voice to join those beyond the mundane “sigh and a mumble” contingent.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact