Kevin has commented on the Presbyterians’ recent decision to approve of practicing homosexual clergy, a move that will only divide an already divided body — still divided even though many of the conservative members hived off decades ago into bodies like the Presbyterian Church in America. The Anglicans in England are beginning to institutionalize even more divisive changes, as the BBC and the Daily Telegraph report.
The Church of England’s General Synod rejected a proposal by the two archbishops to try to give traditionalist members — who include both Evangelicals indistinguishable from Baptists and Anglo-Catholics who use (illegally) the Roman rite in their churches — a little distance from women bishops when the CofE starts ordaining them, as it will. It was a compromise that would make no one happy but that, the archbishops clearly hoped, the majority could accept for the sake of unity.
Theologically, the suggestion was absurd, as the archbishops surely knew. It would not have changed the real relation of traditionalist clergy and people to their female bishops, but only put a male bishop in her place so they wouldn’t have to see her.
She would still be the final authority in her diocese, still the father of the family, if you will. That violates the conservative Evangelicals’ understanding of headship. The male bishop would still be ordained by and in communion with bishops who are in communion with her, meaning that he and therefore the traditionalists he serves would be in communion with her too. That violates the Anglo-Catholics’ understanding of the sacraments and church order. The whole idea’s no good.
But that’s the way of ecclesiastical compromises of this sort and at this level. They paper over real divisions in the hope that someday everything will work out — as it will, but only because the stronger side will eventually wear down or drive out the weaker. Conservative American Episcopalians could tell their English brethren about this.
A Catholic friend who studies the Protestant churches in northern Europe is fond of quoting Lenin’s “The worse, the better” in relation to the traditionalists. They need to know where they stand and be forced to make a clear decision to be in or out and not, as the archbishops’ proposal would have left them doing, pretending to be both in and out.





July 13th, 2010 | 12:23 pm
‘A Catholic friend who studies the Protestant churches in northern Europe is fond of quoting Lenin’s “The worse, the better” in relation to the traditionalists. They need to know where they stand and be forced to make a clear decision to be in or out and not, as the archbishops’ proposal would have left them doing, pretending to be both in and out.’
Exactly!
July 13th, 2010 | 12:30 pm
David,
A good analysis of the same dodge that is forever being tried. The Episcopal Church already did this — the ordination of women was put in as something optional by local option with a pretense of toleration for conservatives. The liberal side has triumphed and there is no longer any toleration. The liberal party line has become dogma.
The CofE began the same way, going so far as to supply “flying bishops”, but the outcome is inevitable. The liberal wing will triumph. It seems more honest to admit this at the outset and permit conservatives to find ways to be what they are, probably outside the official body.
Likewise in the US, ACNA has broken with the Episcopal Church (well, sort of) without challenging the supposed compromise, and has gone back to local option on ordaining women. It won’t work any more than it did in the Episcopal Church. Waffling does not work. It takes an honest presentation of principles to go on.
ed
July 13th, 2010 | 4:49 pm
Everytime I hear such horror stories I am so happy that I am a Catholic. God bless our Pope and Church.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact