Kenya’s constitutional referendum has been, for the past several months, the source of some controversy in the United States with suggestions that the United States has taken a heavy hand in advocating for its approval. It would seem that the reported $23 million spent by the U.S. Agency for International Development to influence Kenyan voters to vote “Yes” has paid off.
The new constitution was approved by a majority of close to 70 percent in a referendum on Wednesday. The new constitution enshrines the right to abortion when “in the opinion of a trained health professional, there is need for emergency treatment, or the life or health of the mother is in danger” as a “fundamental right and freedom.” This is a departure from the previous constitution which made no mention of abortion and the Kenyan penal code which allowed for abortion for the sake of preserving the life of the mother. The provision for abortions in the new constitution comes just two lines after the statement “Every person has the right to life. The life of a person begins at conception.”
The incongruity of thought displayed in this one paragraph of the new constitution was reflected in the country’s decision to ratify it; Kenya is, according to a March 2010 poll, an overwhelmingly pro-life country. In response to the referendum results, the Catholic Bishops of Kenya have published a statement that reminds the people of Kenya, that despite the widespread support for the new constitution, “truth and right are not about numbers. We therefore, as the shepherds placed to give moral guidance to our people, still reiterate the need to address the flawed moral issues in this proposed constitution. That voice should never be silenced.”
The bishops full statement can be read here.




August 6th, 2010 | 7:33 pm
Well, if the Kenyan courts treat its constitution like the U.S courts treat ours, it may not mean anything.
August 6th, 2010 | 8:36 pm
Though I’m no expert and I’m only relying on what I’ve heard in the news, I think it’s important to keep in mind that though the Kenyan church was very vocal about the abortion issue, the main factors driving the voters seem to have been concern for land distribution and preventing the recurrence of tribal warfare. So perhaps this rather minor part of the constitution will be amended in the course of time.
August 7th, 2010 | 2:40 am
My highest hope is that in this moment, spurred on by conscience, Kenyans discover the Church’s teachings on subsidiarity. Does the national Constitution say a certain thing? Well, in fact that does not excuse lower levels of jurisdiction from striving to do what is right. Africa, like the rest of the developing world, has sorely missed the American concept that the center is not the only possible receptacle of power. I hope that they catch on, and if bad law is the spur that starts them doing it, then that would be one of history’s happier ironies.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact