Finally, some common sense from the federal judiciary:
A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked government rules on embryonic stem cell (ESC) research funding, a blow to the Obama administration which by executive order had lifted Bush-era restrictions and a victory for pro-lifers fighting to stop the destruction of human embryos.
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth granted the preliminary injunction because he held opponents of Obama’s executive order had demonstrated they are likely to succeed at trial. Lamberth’s injunction is also important in that it rejects the government’s legal rationale for getting around federal law explicitly forbidding the use of taxpayer dollars to destroy a human embryo.
[. . .]
Lamberth flatly rejected the government’s attempt to distinguish between the destruction of the embryo and research on the destroyed embryo as distinct “pieces of research” — one ineligible for funding and one eligible. They “cannot be separated,” the judge said.
“ESC research is clearly research in which an embryo is destroyed,” Lamberth wrote. “To conduct ESC research, ESCs must be derived from an embryo. The process of deriving ESCs from an embryo results in the destruction of the embryo. Thus, ESC research necessarily depends upon the destruction of a human embryo.”
August 24th, 2010 | 11:40 am
Texas, fight, Texas, fight, yeah Texas, fight! In case you were wondering, Chief Judge Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, is, like myself, an alumnus of that distinguished institution, The University of Texas School of Law. Clearly, Chief Justice Vinson was on to something when he said, “the University of Texas Law School possesses to a far greater degree those qualities which are incapable of objective measurement but which make for greatness in a law school.” Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 634 (1950).
August 25th, 2010 | 1:27 pm
I am from vancouver,canada and i wanted to say that this decision by judge Lamberth is a set back for scientific research in the usa.This is reminisent of what the scientists had to go through in the 17th century in europe when scientists were burned at the stake for their discoveries.A decision like this is the act of a madman which should be condemned by all persons with a grain of common sence.This decision should be overturned as soon as possible.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact