SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Thursday, September 16, 2010, 10:05 AM

Last week, Rick Santorum, former Senator of Pennsylvania, gave a rousing speech on faith in the public square:

Three pictures hung in the home of my devoutly Catholic immigrant grandparents when I was a boy and I remember them well — Jesus, Pope Paul VI and John F. Kennedy. The president was a source of great pride and a symbol to Catholics that all barriers had finally been broken. What my family and maybe even candidate Kennedy at the time didn’t realize was that in a key moment in that election of 1960 right here in Houston, Kennedy began the construction of another, even more threatening wall for our society — one that sealed off informed moral wisdom into a realm of non rational beliefs that have no legitimate role in political discourse.

Fifty years ago this Sunday JFK delivered a speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association to dispel suspicions about the role the papacy might play in the government of this country under his administration. Let’s make no mistake about it — Kennedy was addressing a real issue at the time. Prejudice against Catholics threatened to cost him the election. But on that day, Kennedy chose not just to dispel fear, he chose to expel faith. Let me quote from the beginning of Kennedy’s speech: “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute.”

The idea of strict or absolute separation of church and state is not and never was the American model. It was a model used in countries like France and until recently Turkey, but it found little support in America until it was introduced into the public discourse by Justice Hugo Black in the case of Everson v. The Board of Education in 1947. (Black, by the way, was a Catholic-hating former member of the KKK who ironically enough advocated this strict separation doctrine to keep public funds from Catholic schools.)

Read more . . .

(Via: Craig Carter)

2 Comments

    publius
    September 16th, 2010 | 10:51 am

    Great speech by Santorum.Interestingly enough, when Ted Kennedy was running for re-election to the Senate in 1994 against Mitt Romney, and it appeared Romney might win, the Kennedy’s decided to play the religion ‘card’ against Romney. Ted’s nephew, Congressman Joe Kennedy, raised Romney’s Mormom faith as a reason for Massachusetts voters to reject Romney. The Kennedy’s were all about winning elections – - nothing more. Religious principles were malleable and if need be expendable.

    Ray Ingles
    September 16th, 2010 | 12:07 pm

    I have been criticized in the media for daring to speak out on these sensitive moral issues.

    I don’t recall anyone saying he shouldn’t “speak out”. I do recall people contesting what he actually said. As he says in this speech:

    All of us have an obligation to justify our positions based upon something that is accessible to everyone irrespective of their religious beliefs.

    …and many felt his comments regarding Griswold v. Connecticut (or the “Santorum Amendment” to the No Child Left Behind act) didn’t meet that standard.

    I also think it’s a little ironic that a guy who had a long career as an exceptionally prominent senator (itself an exceptionally powerful position) is worried about “banishing people of faith from having a say in government”.

=