<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extra-Extraordinary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:02:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Daugherty</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-25154</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Daugherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=22196#comment-25154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The congregation of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;50&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; wants to tear it down and replace it but is prevented by its status as a historic landmark. They could just walk away and start anew in a storefront. Let the landmark people pick up the maintenance tab.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The congregation of <i><b>50</b></i> wants to tear it down and replace it but is prevented by its status as a historic landmark. They could just walk away and start anew in a storefront. Let the landmark people pick up the maintenance tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pentamom</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-25114</link>
		<dc:creator>pentamom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=22196#comment-25114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still, Ian, I think there&#039;s a difference between a church that is difficult and expensive to maintain because when it was built, that was the only way to make a church both large and beautiful, and having a building that is a resource-sink when as much beauty could be achieved in other ways with modern methods -- and especially when the thing isn&#039;t even beautiful in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, Ian, I think there&#8217;s a difference between a church that is difficult and expensive to maintain because when it was built, that was the only way to make a church both large and beautiful, and having a building that is a resource-sink when as much beauty could be achieved in other ways with modern methods &#8212; and especially when the thing isn&#8217;t even beautiful in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potkas7</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-25113</link>
		<dc:creator>Potkas7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=22196#comment-25113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As soon as I saw the picture I thought, &#039;I.M. Pei.&#039; The Washington building is very much in the style of the Christian Science H.Q. building he designed in Boston next to the Prudential Center.  Pei&#039;s work can be very good - like the glass pyramid at the Louvre - or abysmal - like the annex building at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.  Personally, I like the work he&#039;s done for the Christian Scientists.  Poured concrete usually makes for brutal-looking buildings reminiscent of the Soviet Union, but Pei adds some artistry to an otherwise austere building  material thus taking away the gulag feeling of cold functionality and adding a touch of humanity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as I saw the picture I thought, &#8216;I.M. Pei.&#8217; The Washington building is very much in the style of the Christian Science H.Q. building he designed in Boston next to the Prudential Center.  Pei&#8217;s work can be very good &#8211; like the glass pyramid at the Louvre &#8211; or abysmal &#8211; like the annex building at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts.  Personally, I like the work he&#8217;s done for the Christian Scientists.  Poured concrete usually makes for brutal-looking buildings reminiscent of the Soviet Union, but Pei adds some artistry to an otherwise austere building  material thus taking away the gulag feeling of cold functionality and adding a touch of humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Landers</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-25110</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=22196#comment-25110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good heavens.  Just the ambiance of the room in which &quot;God is Love&quot; is inscribed makes it appear as though one might as well go ahead and add on &quot;War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery,&quot; etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good heavens.  Just the ambiance of the room in which &#8220;God is Love&#8221; is inscribed makes it appear as though one might as well go ahead and add on &#8220;War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery,&#8221; etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/09/29/extra-extraordinary/comment-page-1/#comment-25109</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=22196#comment-25109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We in Britain are used to churches that are &quot;extremely difficult and expensive to maintain&quot;. Some congregations become little more than historical building preservation societies trying to maintain ancient buildings and to modernise them (toilets anyone?). Some years ago I served on the parish council of a church. The required annual maintenance cost of our lovely but ancient building was one hundred times the amount the church gave for missionary work. Clearly priorities had gotten out of kilter and yet a lot of well-meaning Christian folk couldn&#039;t see that they had other more important work to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We in Britain are used to churches that are &#8220;extremely difficult and expensive to maintain&#8221;. Some congregations become little more than historical building preservation societies trying to maintain ancient buildings and to modernise them (toilets anyone?). Some years ago I served on the parish council of a church. The required annual maintenance cost of our lovely but ancient building was one hundred times the amount the church gave for missionary work. Clearly priorities had gotten out of kilter and yet a lot of well-meaning Christian folk couldn&#8217;t see that they had other more important work to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
