SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Monday, October 11, 2010, 7:41 PM

“It is also not surprising that the same viruses that infect the culture of narcissism infect the culture of total work,” writes Anthony Esolen in Woman of Leisure, combining insights from Christopher Lasch and Josef Pieper.

. . . .And yet it is taken for granted, even by Christians, that all young people, both men and women, must “do” something, by which they mean must find salaried (and preferably prestigious) employment. In my observation, it is not simply, or even principally, for money. It is considered necessary for the building of a “real” life with a real self. That suggests instead a real spiritual poverty, a restlessness, an inability to take delight in those often small and lovely things that should bring us joy.

I was thinking of this the other day, when reading some writer’s comments on small towns in the midwest, which he clearly thought places from which one could only escape, because nothing happens there. He (and I honestly can’t remember his name) was not the sort of writer who would talk about the soul, but  he did describe these places as death to the human spirit, because they are, he thought, dull.

“But what is this life for, after all?” Esolen asks.

The poet John Keats, of dubious Christian faith, called it the “vale of soul-making,” and in that regard he was closer to the truth than we are. It is not the vale of body building, or of career crafting, or of job enhancement, but of soul making, and if we take the lessons of our faith seriously, that can only be by humility, opening ourselves up to the beauty and wonder of the world, and deigning to love those most beautiful and wondrous creatures, our fellow human beings. . . .

If we heed the wisdom of Pieper and Lasch, we will labor most fruitfully when we learn the blessedness of leisure, and we will become most ourselves, most magnanimous, when we learn again the littleness of the child.

I think the writer I mentioned meant the small towns he disliked didn’t have expensive coffee shops and newsstands with lots of magazines you’ll never read and theaters playing obscure movies and neighbors of different colors and unpronounceable names. And street fairs. And lectures that you always mean to go to. And dangerous neighborhoods that provide stories to scare your suburban friends.

But without romanticizing the countryside — I, for one, have no desire to live in the rural midwest — its people have many of those small and lovely things that should bring us joy, at least as many as the man in the city. They have friendship and fellowship, family and community. They may value them more because they don’t have all the distractions, all the pleasures that are less satisfying but more appealing than those.

A church potluck supper with the farmer and the pastor eating a range of bland casseroles can provide as many real pleasures as dinner at the hippest restaurant with the investment banker and the editor. But the reverse is also true, if you genuinely enjoy the food and the company. You can be a small child at the best restaurant in Manhattan as easily as in the grange hall in East Bent Fork, Iowa.

*  *  *  *  *

Tony has written two “On the Square” articles for us, The Soldier’s Rough Charity and Desires Run Not Before Honor, and one article for the magazine, The Freedom of Heaven and the Freedom of Hell (this one’s behind the paywall).

6 Comments

    Martin Snigg
    October 11th, 2010 | 8:26 pm

    And his latest book.

    http://www.isi.org/books/bookdetail.aspx?id=bb314511-0f9e-40ce-a4ce-98bf96dd9eab

    Looking forward to owning this one.

    pentamom
    October 11th, 2010 | 10:27 pm

    Yeah, I happen to like the slower-paced, more family-oriented midwestern lifestyle. But “leisure” can be had in many ways — a slow walk through a museum or a drink at a sidewalk cafe with a friend is a very different thing from a jaw session on the front porch, but neither is more or less “leisure” nor more or less community nor more or less soul-building than the other, assuming both sets of people aspire to all those things.

    As for the “bland casseroles,” that sort of thing is more the stuff of legend than reality. A generation or so ago, it was probably accurate in many places, but everyone everywhere across this land now makes barbecue and tacos and uses widely available spices and fresh, savory ingredients in their cooking. At least in the aggregate, I mean — I suppose there are still a few holdouts wedded exclusively to mushroom soup and tomato sauce, but potluck suppers where such cooks predominate are few and far between even in Nowheresville.

    David Mills
    October 11th, 2010 | 11:07 pm

    But “leisure” can be had in many ways.

    Well, that was my point at the end.

    As for the “bland casseroles,” that sort of thing is more the stuff of legend than reality.

    The last three such meals I’ve had were all classic examples of the stereotype. Although each did offer a dish or two or three that looked sort of like something kind of Mexican, though without the spices, but even the attempt to do something “exotic” is part of the stereotype.

    Michael
    October 12th, 2010 | 8:29 am

    The ancient Greek word for business was ᾿Ασκώλια [Askoolia] literally, absence of leisure; this shows the right outlook on life

    Σκώλια [Skoolia] or leisure, is the origin of our word “School,” a place to indulge disinterested curiosity and the free activity of the mind.

    Kevin
    October 12th, 2010 | 9:56 am

    school = “a place to indulge disinterested curiosity and the free activity of the mind” – if only it were so!!!

    pentamom
    October 12th, 2010 | 10:54 am

    Yes, I meant to agree with your last paragraph.

=