<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholic and Reformed on Living Water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James B. Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/comment-page-1/#comment-28058</link>
		<dc:creator>James B. Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=23842#comment-28058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To Mr. Koehl: Many protestant churches baptize by sprinkling or pouring, since the water is from the &quot;waters above the firmament&quot; that are the entry into heaven. Water from above unites the baptizand with Christ in heaven, who sent down the Spirit from heaven in the first New Creation baptism in Acts 2. Psalm 77:16-18 says that while the Egyptians drowned by submersion, the Israelites were baptized by rain from above. Reformed churches will recognize baptism by submersion as valid though irregular, but only water flowing from above to below: rain, river, sprinkling, etc., is living water. (BTW: being showered upon is immersion, but not submersion. We who sprinkle immerse, but do not submerge.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mr. Koehl: Many protestant churches baptize by sprinkling or pouring, since the water is from the &#8220;waters above the firmament&#8221; that are the entry into heaven. Water from above unites the baptizand with Christ in heaven, who sent down the Spirit from heaven in the first New Creation baptism in Acts 2. Psalm 77:16-18 says that while the Egyptians drowned by submersion, the Israelites were baptized by rain from above. Reformed churches will recognize baptism by submersion as valid though irregular, but only water flowing from above to below: rain, river, sprinkling, etc., is living water. (BTW: being showered upon is immersion, but not submersion. We who sprinkle immerse, but do not submerge.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jizba</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/comment-page-1/#comment-27962</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jizba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=23842#comment-27962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack,

In case of necessity someone who uses the Trinitarian formula and intends to do what the Church does when she baptizes is an authorized person. I&#039;m not sure what is meant by necessity but I would assume that it means there is a risk of dying before an ordinary minister of baptism can arrive to administer the sacrament. You would have to ask a cannon lawyer if necessity could include simply having to wait for a very long time before an ordinary minister of baptism could be found.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>In case of necessity someone who uses the Trinitarian formula and intends to do what the Church does when she baptizes is an authorized person. I&#8217;m not sure what is meant by necessity but I would assume that it means there is a risk of dying before an ordinary minister of baptism can arrive to administer the sacrament. You would have to ask a cannon lawyer if necessity could include simply having to wait for a very long time before an ordinary minister of baptism could be found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/comment-page-1/#comment-27961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=23842#comment-27961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;In order for a baptism to be valid, it must be administered by someone authorized to do so&#8230;&lt;/i&gt;

Wait. Really? What happened to this passage from the Catholic Catechism? 

&lt;b&gt;1256&lt;/b&gt; &#8230;&lt;i&gt;In case of necessity, anyone, even a nonbaptized person, with the required intention, can baptize , by using the Trinitarian baptismal formula. The intention required is to will to do what the church does when she baptizes.&lt;/i&gt; &#8230;

Am I reading too much into the first statement?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In order for a baptism to be valid, it must be administered by someone authorized to do so&hellip;</i></p>
<p>Wait. Really? What happened to this passage from the Catholic Catechism? </p>
<p><b>1256</b> &hellip;<i>In case of necessity, anyone, even a nonbaptized person, with the required intention, can baptize , by using the Trinitarian baptismal formula. The intention required is to will to do what the church does when she baptizes.</i> &hellip;</p>
<p>Am I reading too much into the first statement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Sim Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/comment-page-1/#comment-27944</link>
		<dc:creator>George Sim Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 01:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=23842#comment-27944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My understanding is that the Catholic Church accepts as valid any baptism that is in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit (i.e., Trinitarian) and makes use of water.  Adult converts from Protestant denominations do not receive Baptism if previously baptized, while they do need to be confirmed, even if confirmed in their previous denomination.  Mormons who convert (a rare breed, no doubt), do need to be baptized, since the Mormons do not understand the Trinity the way the Catholic Church does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that the Catholic Church accepts as valid any baptism that is in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit (i.e., Trinitarian) and makes use of water.  Adult converts from Protestant denominations do not receive Baptism if previously baptized, while they do need to be confirmed, even if confirmed in their previous denomination.  Mormons who convert (a rare breed, no doubt), do need to be baptized, since the Mormons do not understand the Trinity the way the Catholic Church does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Koehl</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2010/11/02/catholic-and-reformed-on-living-water/comment-page-1/#comment-27937</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Koehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=23842#comment-27937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So who sprinkles?  Certainly the Latin Church has abandoned this since Vatican II, and the Eastern Churches prefer full immersion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who sprinkles?  Certainly the Latin Church has abandoned this since Vatican II, and the Eastern Churches prefer full immersion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
