SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, January 14, 2011, 12:04 PM

Quoting the Times, “In a down payment on riches to come, scientists from NASA’s Kepler satellite announced Monday that they had discovered the smallest planet yet found outside our solar system and the first that was unquestionably rocky, like the Earth.”

It’s the “like the earth” part that always annoys me. From the description of this extrasolar planet, it is nothing like the Earth. Kepler 10b, as it is called, is forty percent larger than Earth and almost five times denser, about the same density as iron. It spins around its star in a dizzy orbital “year” that measures just twenty hours in length at a distance of only one-twentieth as that separating Mercury from the Sun. One of the discoverers, Natalie Batalha, calls it a “scorched world.” You think? This suggests to me a planet that is more like a colossal red hot ball bearing going very, very, like really, fast than anything remotely “like the Earth.”

Yet Kepler 10b is called exactly that and hailed by University of California, Berkeley, astronomer Geoffrey Marcy as a discovery that “will be marked as among the most profound in human history.” I actually think the wheel and agriculture rank a little higher, but then I don’t live in Berkeley.

Okay, yes, I admit to being pretty earth-centric (if not earth-chauvinistic) in my thinking about the cosmos and all. I subscribe to the “rare earth” notion. I didn’t always. Once upon a time I could recite the Drake Equation from memory. Much to my family’s regret, I enjoy watching History Channel’s Ancient Aliens. They hate it, but the “Aliens and the Third Reich” episode is way cool, I think. Once, in my present parish which has guys here who’d like to start a MUFON chapter, I pulled together a bible class on UFOs. But, honestly, I am tired of waiting for aliens and Earth-like planets. I will not discount the likelihood of discovering a real Earth-like planet some day, one that is strategically located (one might say miraculously, if you don’t mean anything theological by the word) within a stable solar habitable zone that comes complete with rocks, liquid water, biologic gases, and, oh, one that has a moon to keep it all gravitationally agitated just right. That, I do confess, might just belong up there with agriculture and the wheel.

Meanwhile, though, I think Dr. Marcy would do well to lower his gushy school-girl hyperbole a little bit.

5 Comments

    Pastor Spomer
    January 14th, 2011 | 12:52 pm

    What if, every time a discovery was made in the field of say, geology, it would be couched in terms of “we may have found intelligent life in the center of the Earth!”?

    No astronomical observation is deemed worthy of public report if it doesn’t have some imagined connection to extra-terrestrial life.

    This gives witness to the cosmic loneliness felt by those who ignore the real unworldly Visitor, Who not only came, but saved us poor Earthlings.

    pentamom
    January 14th, 2011 | 1:40 pm

    I think “will be marked as among the most profound in human history” means “will be the high point of my career and guarantee me prominence in my field.” Which might say something about Dr. Marcy’s perception of his own place in history.

    Mike Melendez
    January 14th, 2011 | 2:44 pm

    I wouldn’t read anything into Dr. Marcy’s proud claim. English no longer uses an adjective not in need of the modifier “very”. Except that the modifier “very” is itself obsolete and replaced by “extremely”. And that’s where no adverb whatever is really needed.

    Dr. Marcy’s discovery does benefit from needing a modifier. He found something very far away and very small, very close to ball of flaming gas. So what’s left for him when “extremely” is just too mild. I suggest “most profound in human history” fits the bill. And that’s what now is replacing use of the adverb “very”.

    What to think
    January 14th, 2011 | 3:51 pm

    I feel as if the way they talk about new findings, is just a way to keep their jobs. I mean lets be realistic, if this planet is “earth-like” why aren’t they looking a little more into it? if I’m making any sense.

    Gary Keith Chesterton
    January 16th, 2011 | 9:19 am

    I don’t get cable, but I think I might just so I can watch a program about aliens and the Third Reich.

=