The University of California-Davis has a peculiar new religious discrimination policy:
The UC-Davis policy defines “Religious/Spiritual Discrimination” as “the loss of power and privilege to those who do not practice the dominant culture’s religion. In the United States, this is institutionalized oppressions toward those who are not Christian.”
“Christians deserve the same protections against religious discrimination as any other students on a public university campus,” says Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) Senior Counsel David French. “It’s ridiculously absurd to single out Christians as oppressors and non-Christians as the only oppressed people on campus when the facts show that public universities are more hostile to Christians than anyone else.”
A from ADF-allied attorney Tim Swickard to UC-Davis explains, “It is patently clear that UC Davis’s definition of religious discrimination is blatantly unconstitutional under both the Federal and California State Constitutions. The policy singles out some faiths for official school protection while denying the same protection to others solely on the basis of their particular religious views…Moreover, the UC-Davis policy is simply nonsensical given the environment on most University campuses where Christian students, if anything, are among the most likely to be subjected to discrimination because of their faith.”
The letter cites a recent study of more than 1,200 faculty at public universities that showed that professors admitted to having a significant bias against Christian students, particularly evangelicals. Fifty-three percent admitted to having negative feelings about evangelical students solely because of their religious beliefs.
I suspect that roughly a hundred percent of evangelical students have negative feelings about professors who have negative feelings about them solely because of their religious beliefs. Since the negative feelings of the students can lead to a loss of privilege for the professors, it’s obvious that these evangelical students are practicing religious discrimination. Hopefully, UC Davis will properly punish these believers for their thought-crimes.
(Via: Gene Veith)




February 18th, 2011 | 1:26 pm
Evan an atheist like me can disagree with that definition.
February 18th, 2011 | 1:50 pm
UC-Davis backed down when the ADF threatened legal action….
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/02/16/university-says-change-definition-christians-oppressors/
February 18th, 2011 | 3:21 pm
For some time, the UC-Davis policy has been believed to be the standard one at many campuses. I believe this is the first time it has been placed in writing. It has not in the past for the obvious reason that it violates freedom of religion. The question is, “What did the UC-Davis administrators think had changed?”
February 18th, 2011 | 4:29 pm
All the more reason to support the Alliance Defense Fund….
February 18th, 2011 | 9:22 pm
Ray
An honest atheist. Good for you. No predispositions, just a grasp on reality. You and I have disagreements on matters metaphysical, to be sure, but the realities of this side, to one seeking the truth, are inescapable.
Besides, arguing with Gene Veith gets really complicated, really quick.
February 18th, 2011 | 10:13 pm
Gotta love the headlines:
UC Davis strikes diversity statement that offended Christians
UC Davis removes Web wording that upset Christians
February 19th, 2011 | 10:16 am
Evan an atheist like me can disagree with that definition.
Thank you.
Gotta love the headlines:
UC Davis strikes diversity statement that offended Christians
UC Davis removes Web wording that upset Christians
………….wow…………..
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact