SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, February 18, 2011, 10:30 AM

Continuing on the theme that the novels of Jane Austen can be used to explain just about anything, I give you this passage from Dorothy L. Cheney and Robert M. Seyfarth’s Baboon Metaphysics:

In sum, monkey society is governed by the same two general rules that governed the behavior of women in so many 19th-century novels: stay loyal to your relatives (though perhaps at a distance, if they are a social impediment) but also try to ingratiate yourself with the members of high-ranking families. The two rules interact in interesting ways. For members of high-ranking matrilines, the rules of kin-based and rank-based attraction reinforce one another, whereas for the members of low-ranking families they counteract. A member of a high-ranking matriline is attracted to her kin not only because they are members of the same family but also because they are high-ranking. A member of a low-ranking family may be attracted to her kin, but she is also drawn away from them by her attraction to unrelated, higher-status individuals. As a result, high-ranking families are often more cohesive than lower-ranking ones. Or, to paraphrase Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina, all high-ranking families are alike in their cohesiveness, each low-ranking family is cohesive or not, in its own way.

1 Comment

    jason taylor
    February 18th, 2011 | 1:40 pm

    If rank leads to family cohesiveness can anyone explain the conspicuous dysfunctional behavior among high ranking families? Would you predict adultery to be less probable in a movie star’s family, or fratricide in an aristocrat’s family?

=