SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Friday, July 22, 2011, 12:50 PM

1. Indian Levitation Trick Revealed

(Via: Neatorama)

°°°°°°

2. Test Your Vocab: How many words do you know?

°°°°°°

3. Why aren’t the oldest living people getting any older?

Last month, a 114-year-old former schoolteacher from Georgia named Besse Cooper became the world’s oldest living person. Her predecessor, Brazil’s Maria Gomes Valentim, was 114 when she died. So was the oldest living person before her, and the one before her. In fact, eight of the last nine “world’s oldest” titleholders were 114 when they achieved the distinction. Here’s the morbid part: All but two were still 114 when they passed it on. Those two? They died at 115.

°°°°°°

4. How Much Does it Cost to go to Hogwarts?

°°°°°°

5. Why astronauts can’t whistle in space

stronauts on a spacewalk cannot whistle. This was discovered on the fly by intrepid astronaut Dan Barry in 1999. Fortunately, it did not affect the mission, but should any astronaut have to call a dog in space, the results would be disastrous.

Space agencies try to work out all eventualities and possible needs, but one unexpected consequence of space travel was discovered during a space walk by astronaut Dan Barry. A usual function, performed perfectly normally on earth, suddenly failed in deep space. Fortunately, it wasn’t necessary for the mission. Barry just tried whistling. Tried, and failed.

°°°°°°

6. Can Catholics donate their body to science?

°°°°°°

7. Weird News of the Week: Truck Crash Releases 14 Million Angry Bees, And Honey, On Highway

The bees swarmed in black clouds that kept the truck driver and rescue personnel in their vehicles until they could put on protective gear. In the end, it seems that many of the bees were killed after being sprayed by firefighting foam.

But while workers were being stung as they tried to clean up U.S. Highway 20, Fire Chief Kenny Strandberg worried about another problem.

“I am worried about the bears coming down now — the grizzly bears,” he said.

°°°°°°

8. 7 Bone-Chilling Classic Horror Films You Can Legally Download Or Stream for Free

°°°°°°

9. Salt cravings may be the origin of all drug addictions

All humans crave salt once in a while. The desire is hardwired into an ancient part of our brains, the hypothalamus, because we need it to keep our bodies working properly. Now it looks like some of the more addictive drugs out there could be co-opting this neurological system — which means our desire for salt is what underlies our cravings for everything from heroin to coffee.

New research has shown that cocaine and opiates may hijack the same brain connections that serve to make us crave salt. The scientists discovered this when mice with blocked addiction-related pathways no longer had the sodium cravings that normal mice did.

°°°°°°

10. 10 Fascinating Facts About Phone Numbers

°°°°°°

11. Scientist’s study classifies 14 different shapes of noses

Professor Abraham Tamir toured shopping centres in Europe and Israel, taking candid photographs of people with interesting noses. He then sorted the 1,300 pictures and matched each with a face on a painting or other piece of art.

This revealed there to be 14 types of nose, with classifications ranging from ‘fleshy’ to ‘celestial’.

The most common, particularly among men, was the fleshy nose, best illustrated by Prince Philip, which featured on almost a quarter of all the faces studied.

°°°°°°

12. Image of the Week: A Hotel Bedroom Under the Sea

Walkways in aquariums are impressive, but they’ve got nothing on this underwater hotel bedroom in the Maldives. Can you imagine waking up with the Indian Ocean and its sea life floating around you?

°°°°°°

13. Woman Pays $10,000 For ‘Non-Visible’ Work Of Art

We’ve all seen strange reactions to abstract pieces of art. Think about how many times you’ve heard, “I could do that in an afternoon,” in reaction to a Jackson Pollack or a “really someone paid for that?” in reaction to a Marc Rothko.

But, last month, the actor James Franco put his name behind a strange new project called the Museum of Non-Visible Art, which takes what it calls conceptual art to a whole new level. Their website is here and there’s an explainer video here, but in simple terms, the idea of the museum is that the works of art don’t exist physically, instead they are imagined by the artist. So when you purchase the “work of art” you get a “card” to hang on an empty wall and you “describe it to your audience.”

°°°°°°

14. 25 Everyday Things You Never Knew Had Names

°°°°°°

15. Harvard ethics fellow steals millions of papers

A Harvard University fellow who was studying ethics was charged with hacking into the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s computer network to steal nearly 5 million academic articles.

Aaron Swartz, 24, was accused of stealing the documents from JSTOR, a popular research subscription service that offers digitized copies of more than 1,000 academic journals and documents, some dating back to the 17th century.

In an indictment released Tuesday, prosecutors say Swartz stole 4.8 million articles between September 2010 and January after breaking into a computer wiring closet on MIT’s campus. Swartz, a student at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, downloaded so many documents during one October day that some of JSTOR’s computer servers crashed, according to the indictment.

Prosecutors say Swartz intended to distribute the articles on file-sharing websites.

°°°°°°

16. Infographic of the Week: The Internet of Things

°°°°°°

17. Why is ‘tasty’ good but ‘smelly’ bad?

[T]he things that we taste and the things that we smell differ systematically in how pleasant and unpleasant they are. The reason is that we have generally more control over what we put into our mouth than what enters our nose. If one guiding principle of our behavior is the maximization of pleasure, and if there are roughly equally many pleasant and unpleasant smells and tastes available, then we should draw more pleasure out of the sense that we can control, than out of the sense that we cannot control as easily. Consequently, what we taste will be more likely pleasant than what we smell.

°°°°°°

18. 13 of the Best Old-School Girl Toys

°°°°°°

19. What Happens When You Average 4,000 Horoscopes?

Astrology has been in the headlines a lot lately with the (bogus) reports that the zodiac was changing and everything was going to be different. So what about the zodiac we’ve got? David McCandless and Thomas Winnigham recently did some clever data-mining to grab thousands of online horoscopes, then ran them through word-analysis software to see their common features.

With that data in hand, they produced a “generic, meta prediction that would apply to all star signs, every day of the year”

°°°°°°

20. 10 Odd Ways To Get Rid of Flies

°°°°°°

21. The craziest experimental weapons of the 19th century

By itself, a cannon is pretty devastating. So what if you took two cannons and – get this – put them together? That was the idea of John Gilleland, a Georgia dentist and mechanic – one can only hope he drew more upon his mechanical experience than his dental in building the thing – who designed the double-barreled cannon in 1862.

The cannon combined two six-pound guns, which had been cast in a single piece at the Athens Steam Company. The cannon was designed so that either gun could be fired separately or simultaneously. It was this latter possibility that, if it had worked, would have made Gilleland a genius. His notion was to connect two cannon balls together with a chain and then fire them out of the cannon all at once, which would then cut through the enemy “mow down the enemy somewhat as a scythe cuts wheat.”

°°°°°°

22. HistoricalLOL of the Week

°°°°°°

23. Why people eat dirt

Geophagy is the name given to the practice of eating dirt, apparently, its quite common in the human and animal world. But why?

[. . . ]

[Scientists] found that people who ate dirt were more likely to suffer from intestinal parasites and digestive sickness, and concluded that that’s expected when people eat dirt. When examining the actual dirt eaten, this new study found that it was dug up from far beneath the surface level, and was boiled thoroughly before eating. (That’s right. People need to properly cook dirt.) There wasn’t much evidence that any new bacteria were introduced into the system with the dirt. Instead, it kills off whatever harmful stuff is already there. It seems that humans, and some other mammals, eat dirt to clean themselves up.

°°°°°°

24. 12 things you may not have known about the Appalachian Trail

°°°°°°

25. Wiedemann-Franz Law: Physicists Break 150-Year-Old Empirical Laws of Physics

A violation of one of the oldest empirical laws of physics has been observed by scientists at the University of Bristol. Their experiments on purple bronze, a metal with unique one-dimensional electronic properties, indicate that it breaks the Wiedemann-Franz Law. This historic discovery is described in a paper published July 20 in Nature Communications.

In 1853, two German physicists, Gustav Wiedemann and Rudolf Franz, studied the thermal conductivity (a measure of a system’s ability to transfer heat) of a number of elemental metals and found that the ratio of the thermal to electrical conductivities was approximately the same for different metals at the same temperature

°°°°°°

26. Nine Things Successful People Do Differently

°°°°°°

27. Better Book Titles of the Week – Thomas Hardy: The Mayor of Casterbridge

°°°°°°

28. How-To of the Week: Securely Tie Anything to Your Car

°°°°°°

29. University of Leicester develops test for classifying force used in bottle stabbings

Engineers at the University of Leicester have for the first time created a way of measuring how much force is used during a stabbing using a broken bottle. The advance is expected to have significant implications for legal forensics.

A team from the University has conducted a systematic study of the force applied during a stabbing and come up with the first set of penetration force data for broken glass bottles. This work has been published in the International Journal of Legal Medicine.

Stabbing is the most common method of committing murder in the UK. Injuries and assaults related to alcohol consumption are also a growing concern in many countries. In such cases the impulsive use of weapons such as a glass bottle is not uncommon.

In approximately 10% of all assaults resulting in treatment in the United Kingdom (UK) emergency units, glasses and bottles are used as weapons. Official UK estimates suggest that a form of glass is used as a weapon in between 3,400 and 5,400 offences per year. There is little understanding of how much force is required to create the injuries as, until now, there have been no systematic studies of how much force is required to penetrate skin with such weapons.

°°°°°°

30. Tech Shopping Rules of Thumb

°°°°°°

31. Police Start Giving Angry Drunk People Lollipops to Calm Them Down

Ms. Thornton-Joe said after the men popped a lolly in their mouths, their nasty energy all but dissolved. “They got calmer after taking the lollipops,” she said. “It had an immediate effect.” [...]

The sucker punch works for several reasons, she said. First, it’s difficult to yell while sucking a lollipop.

Altercations happen due to verbal exchanges, but with a sucker in the mouth, there’s less talk, which results in fewer fights.

The lollipop’s sugar hit calms those who’ve drank too much, she said. And the lolly’s pacifier effect can’t be denied.

°°°°°°

32. Average Home Sizes Around the World

°°°°°°

33. The Quicker Ketchup Picker-Upper

(Via: Kottke)

12 Comments

    Alessandra
    July 22nd, 2011 | 1:15 pm

    On the other hand:

    “America’s population of centenarians – already the largest in the world – has roughly doubled in the past 20 years to around 72,000 and is projected to at least double again by 2020, perhaps even increase seven-fold, according to the Census Bureau.”

    I would love to live to be 100 if I were to be in good health. Imagine how fascinating to witness all the transformations in an entire century!

    I think that perhaps the scariest about getting old, aside from really grave and painful illnesses, is anything that affects your mind in a horrible way, like dementia. Maybe as medicine advances, we will see increasingly better means developed for preventing and treating it.

    Then there is the social and emotional aspect of life. To live in a depressed, lonely state, dumped in some home (for the more fortunate), or in some horrible poverty state is also particularly frightening.

    Who wants to live in a demented state? But to live in control of your mind, being active, enjoying life, that’s wonderful. Well, so here’s to all the centenarians in the world: May they continue on strong! They are an ode to life.

    More at:
    http://socimages.blogsome.com/2011/04/27/1oo-birthday-candles-and-sailing-along/

    Alessandra
    July 22nd, 2011 | 1:37 pm

    The other very interesting thing about the enormous advances made regarding life expectancy is the following:

    “The age of 65 was originally selected as the time for retirement by the “Iron Chancellor,” Otto von Bismark of Germany, when he introduced a social security system to appeal to the German working class and combat the power of the Socialist Party in Germany during the late 1800s.

    Somewhat cynically, Bismark knew that the program would cost little because the average German worker never reached 65, and many of those who did lived only a few years beyond that age.

    When the United States finally passed a social security law in 1935 (more than 55 years after the conservative German chancellor introduced it in Germany), the average life expectancy in America was only 61.7 years.

    So, in fact, medical and other health enhancing developments in society have occurred at a drastically rapid pace in the Western world, making life expectancy jump decades from what it was in the past. The retirement age basically stayed put. If retirement age were to be adjusted in the same manner as life expectancy advances, current retirement cutoff ages should be around 80.

    Not that I am advocating a system where no one lives long enough to retire, but the enormous changes in longevity must now reopen the debate of retirement.

    Many current retirement systems around the world are either not sustainable or on their way to becoming unsustainable. Furthermore, as long as people are in good health, and living to, let’s say, 90 years old, it seems incongruous to me that they should spend half of their lives in unproductive leisure, in cases where they are fit to contribute to society in many important ways.

    bob
    July 22nd, 2011 | 3:20 pm

    and finally the levitation trick has been revealed. But the poor indians still don’t understand these tricks and follow the crooks… Such a pity!!

    David Nickol
    July 22nd, 2011 | 3:43 pm

    While I would be extraordinarily skeptical of an indian yogi who claimed to levitate, even if I saw it with my own eyes, demonstrating how levitation can be faked doesn’t prove that all people who levitate are fakes. Some of the truly great saints claimed to levitate, or the claim was made about them: Saint Francis Xavier, Saint Ignatius Loyola, Saint John Joseph of the Cross, Saint Martin de Porres, and perhaps most famously Saint Teresa of Avila. I admit to being skeptical about them, too, but it still seems that levitation (as well as walking on water), must be considered within the realm of possibility by believing Christians.

    Funnier Than Having a Roman Nose – Justin Taylor
    July 22nd, 2011 | 5:35 pm

    [...] HT: Joe Carter [...]

    tioedong
    July 22nd, 2011 | 7:25 pm

    any article on why people can only live so long that ignores the Hayflick limit (cells only are able to divide so many times due to the length of the telemere) is junk science.

    Jon Rowe
    July 22nd, 2011 | 7:54 pm

    I hope the woo woo, hyperbole and sometimes outright fraud doesn’t poison the well of yoga and meditation. These absolutely should be practiced regularly for our mental health and well being. You concerned about too many folks on anti-depressants: this is *a* solution.

    My favorite anecdote is the Beatles (save George who remained a devotee until his death) had a falling out with the Maharishi. The reason: He claimed to be truly free from all worldly desires, including lust. Yet, he apparently had the hots for Prudence Farrow. Yet Paul and Ringo still meditation because they find it useful.

    Joe DeVet
    July 23rd, 2011 | 7:28 am

    I clicked on the horror-film item, and the third entry under that was “golf in Houston.”

    I know something about golf in Houston, having partaken many times, and can attest that it is a horror. But it’s important to point out that it’s not a horror per se, but only because I bring horror to it when I do it, and am routinely horrified by my score!

    However, my ineptitude aside, golf in Houston is a delightful and even spiritual experience, as it is most any place in the world. One looks around at the transcendent beauty of the course, and marvels at how gorgeous God could have made creation, if only He’d had the money!

    astorian
    July 23rd, 2011 | 8:58 am

    Is Bismarck picked 65 as the ideal retirement age in the cynical belief that practically nobody would ever live long enough to collect, he was acting foolishly.

    Indeed, I OFTEN hear people tossing around factoids like “In Jesus’ day, people only lived to be 35″ or “In medieval England, the average lifespan was 40,” and then jump from that factoid to all kinds of strange and wholly unjustified conclusions.

    For instance, I’ve frequently seen people arguing that “til death do us part” may have been a tolerable concept 2,000 years ago, when people only lived to be 35, but that it’s unrealistic to expect people to stay married forever now that most live to be over 80. That is an absurd reading of the situation, and a complete misinterpretation of what average life expectancy meant.

    In the not-so-distant past, an average life expectancy of 40 did NOT mean that most (or even many) people keeled over at the age of 40. Rather, it meant that a large percentage of children never reached adulthood, which dragged down the average enormously.

    Remember what the Bible said? “Three score and ten are a man’s years, or eighty, if he is strong”? Even in the days of King David, a person who survived childhood diseases and reached adulthood could expect to live about as long as we do. Which means our longer life expectancy doesn’t change ANYTHING, with regard to marriage- the couple that got married at Cana expected they’d be living together for 40 or 50 years, just as a young couple marrying today would.

    Similarly, most 19th century factory workers in Bavaria DID reach 65! And most lived another decade or more after that.

    JB in CA
    July 23rd, 2011 | 6:53 pm

    any article on why people can only live so long that ignores the Hayflick limit (cells only are able to divide so many times due to the length of the telemere) is junk science.

    So are you suggesting that the researchers who deny that the Hayflick limit is fixed and hypothesize that cell life could be extended by restoring the length of telomeres with telomerase activators are wrong? If not, it seems a bit premature to accuse an article of advocating “junk science” simply because it fails to recognize the Hayflick limit as a fixed upper bound. On the other hand, if you are suggesting that the researchers in question are wrong, it would be interesting to know what evidence led you to that conclusion.

    Boonton
    July 25th, 2011 | 8:48 pm

    Good point astorian. The relevant metric here is ‘life expectancy by age’. For example, look at http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005140.html

    In 1850, a white US man who was already 20 years old could expect to live another 40.1 years. This does not mean 40 years later, in 1890, all the 20 yr olds from 1850 fell over and died. It’s an average so some people died less than 40 years later and others died more. A man who was 50 yrs old in 1850 could expect to see another 21.6 years. Social security and Germany’s pension system were not con games simply because they set the retirement age at a few years less than total life expectancy. Even in the ‘primitive mid 1800′s’ you had a reasonably decent chance of seeing a few 65+ years if you were able to dodge infant mortality and childhood kilers and make it into the working world.

    Blake
    July 27th, 2011 | 4:40 pm

    So are you suggesting that the researchers who deny that the Hayflick limit is fixed and hypothesize that cell life could be extended by restoring the length of telomeres with telomerase activators are wrong?

    The entire phrase “junk science” is a lazy man’s shortcut – it enables people to discredit other peoples’ work without having to take the time and trouble to identify the actual flaw in the method or problem in the work.

    Which, in turn, enables science to move from a mere method to a complete ideology – one that has defined beliefs, and anyone who believes otherwise is “junk science” – the word comes to mean nothing more than “heretic”, outside the ideology.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact