Support First Things by turning your adblocker off or by making a  donation. Thanks!

This site, and most of what I do, involves human exceptionalism, bioethics, and the like.  But I still care about areas about which I formerly focused.  And sometimes, I take metaphorical pen in hand.

Pervasive secrecy corrupts the societal purposes of our civil justice system. Today in the San Francisco Chronicle, bouncing off the Herman Cain brouhaha, I criticize the ubiquitous practice of confidential settlements to resolve civil disputes.  From my conclusion:

The time has come to draw open the curtains. Confidentiality:
- Allows dangerous products to remain on the market.

- Protects the reputations of those who engage in systemic wrongdoing.
- Makes it easier for the unscrupulous to profit from bogus claims and defenses.
- Inreases the cost of insurance.
- Adds to congestion in the courts.
- Most ironically, secret settlements push the plaintiff and the defense, who should be legal adversaries, into a form of private collusion for which the rest of society pays.

Civil justice secrecy is a very important problem that receives far too little attention.  Now, back to our usual fare.


Comments are visible to subscribers only. Log in or subscribe to join the conversation.

Tags

Loading...

Filter First Thoughts Posts

Related Articles