<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Cameron on Religious Freedom versus &#8220;Moral Neutrality&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-56298</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=37831#comment-56298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i had meant to comment some more on this topic but didn&#039;t have the time until today.  why america can&#039;t produce leaders who talk like david cameron is a fantastic question.  

perhaps it has to do with the relative age of the two countries.  america is a child of the enlightenment whereas england can&#039;t quite shake off its pre-modern roots no matter how hard she tries....  any other thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had meant to comment some more on this topic but didn&#8217;t have the time until today.  why america can&#8217;t produce leaders who talk like david cameron is a fantastic question.  </p>
<p>perhaps it has to do with the relative age of the two countries.  america is a child of the enlightenment whereas england can&#8217;t quite shake off its pre-modern roots no matter how hard she tries&#8230;.  any other thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tan</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-56091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 08:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=37831#comment-56091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;just as our language and culture is steeped in the Bible, so too is our politics. From human rights and equality to our constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy…&#039; - David Cameron

I guess, from this we can see that the democratic project began way before the Enlightenment, it is rooted in biblical religion, in Jerusalem.

Equality - due to the fact that we are all made in the image of God.

Constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy - due to the fact that since we are equal, one should not be made an unwilling subject of another. 

Fundamental rights - are inalienable due to the ontological view of man that biblical religion has proposed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;just as our language and culture is steeped in the Bible, so too is our politics. From human rights and equality to our constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy…&#8217; &#8211; David Cameron</p>
<p>I guess, from this we can see that the democratic project began way before the Enlightenment, it is rooted in biblical religion, in Jerusalem.</p>
<p>Equality &#8211; due to the fact that we are all made in the image of God.</p>
<p>Constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy &#8211; due to the fact that since we are equal, one should not be made an unwilling subject of another. </p>
<p>Fundamental rights &#8211; are inalienable due to the ontological view of man that biblical religion has proposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Forster</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-56064</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Forster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=37831#comment-56064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oops! I got it right in the title but not the text. Thanks for catching that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I got it right in the title but not the text. Thanks for catching that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2011/12/16/david-cameron-on-religious-freedom-versus-moral-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-56063</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=37831#comment-56063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[prime minister &quot;james&quot; cameron?  i thought he was the &quot;king of the world.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prime minister &#8220;james&#8221; cameron?  i thought he was the &#8220;king of the world.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
