<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul and Christian Reconstructionism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/01/06/paul-and-christian-reconstructionism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/01/06/paul-and-christian-reconstructionism/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pentamom</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/01/06/paul-and-christian-reconstructionism/comment-page-1/#comment-57229</link>
		<dc:creator>pentamom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=38369#comment-57229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bahnsen&#039;s and Wilson&#039;s comment that there are connections between libertarians and Reconstructionists should never be taken to mean that they are the same thing, or that one is a subset of another. In fact, for the very reasons Mr. Knippenberg explains, they are disjoint sets -- at least if the word &quot;libertarian&quot; means what it means.

So there&#039;s sympathy between the Paul camp and Reconstructionists because of shared concerns, but it&#039;s pure Goldbergian hysteria to make that mean that the Paulistas follow a Recon model.

A parallel case might be anti-cronyist conservatives&#039; sympathies for the *concerns of* the Occupy Movement. Neither side makes common cause with the other, but they do support one another *insofar as* they are addressing that particular concern.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bahnsen&#8217;s and Wilson&#8217;s comment that there are connections between libertarians and Reconstructionists should never be taken to mean that they are the same thing, or that one is a subset of another. In fact, for the very reasons Mr. Knippenberg explains, they are disjoint sets &#8212; at least if the word &#8220;libertarian&#8221; means what it means.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s sympathy between the Paul camp and Reconstructionists because of shared concerns, but it&#8217;s pure Goldbergian hysteria to make that mean that the Paulistas follow a Recon model.</p>
<p>A parallel case might be anti-cronyist conservatives&#8217; sympathies for the *concerns of* the Occupy Movement. Neither side makes common cause with the other, but they do support one another *insofar as* they are addressing that particular concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
