<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Greg Forster, Not-So-Good Greg Forster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/04/30/good-greg-forster-not-so-good-greg-forster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/04/30/good-greg-forster-not-so-good-greg-forster/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Riddl</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/04/30/good-greg-forster-not-so-good-greg-forster/comment-page-1/#comment-63497</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Riddl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=42494#comment-63497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He says a lot of smart things in that article, until his conclusion that evangelical political engagement is part of the problem.   In reality his article and criticism of you are one and the same.   In both cases he expresses the viewpoint that the engaging is the thing that causes defeat.  

My response would be that his kind of romanticism is allowed to exist precisely because there are those who will directly engage and confront.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He says a lot of smart things in that article, until his conclusion that evangelical political engagement is part of the problem.   In reality his article and criticism of you are one and the same.   In both cases he expresses the viewpoint that the engaging is the thing that causes defeat.  </p>
<p>My response would be that his kind of romanticism is allowed to exist precisely because there are those who will directly engage and confront.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
