Comments on: Another Becket Fund Victory for Religious Freedom

By: ahem

ahem — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:35:45 +0000

Try this instead:

Muslim Brotherhood memorandum

By: ahem

ahem — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:33:37 +0000

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:1pFOHLk391cJ:www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf+Muslim+Brotherhood+memorandum&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiT1N6YRCXW45FK_fY6s57-NBglrJc6LrbBPXS0PGsj-2IBDcqLrJqUYwOtESvE8P89xjqDGSBJ0o1QNZeH2zy3qeXkkwz6w9Z4JOurxkmraU-6evzr5jKCDsci94s8r_90CDzR&sig=AHIEtbTLELgBETGhSwGAvScYNwNYGCivoQ

By: ahem

ahem — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:33:06 +0000

Mr. George:

The following link points to a document (“An Explanatory Memorandum, On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” 5/22/1991) that the FBI found in connection with its investigations surrounding the Holy Land Foundation terrorism finance trial. The paper outlines the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan to replace all institutions of the United States with Islamic institutions. The first half is in Arabic, the second half is an English translation. It’s only about 15 pages long.

“…The memorandum is derived from 1) The General Strategic Goal of the Group in America which was approved by the Shura Council and the Organizational Conference for the year [1987] is Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood…”

CAIR and, by extension,the Muslim Brotherhood (Hamas, Hezbollah, etc.) for which it fronts in the United States, was an unindicted co-conspirator at that trial. Oddly enough, Obama has allowed several advisers from the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House, among whom is Dahlia Mogahed, who, ironically, serves as Obama’s head of Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships–whatever that is. Ironically, because she supports sharia, which is inocompatible with, and inimical to, American law.

Among the goals stated in the paper, is “civilization-jihad”, a key element of which is the establishment of mosques in America like there is no tomorrow—exactly what is happening in Tennessee. (That’s not exactly the way the paper expressed it, but you get my point.)

It is a pity that terrorists are being assisted, and we are all being endangered–Christians especially–by well-meaning nincompoops such as yourself.

By: David Davies

David Davies — Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:52:21 +0000

Islam combines the political and the theological in comprehensive system which is totalitarian in scope. I don’t know how it cannot be called a ‘political project’ just as easily as it can be called a ‘religion’. We have the right as a nation to combat political forces intent upon our destruction. The only Islam we should permit is one which has been dis-integrated and no longer contains a political component.

By: Readering

Readering — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:12:49 +0000

Professor George’s comments are very well taken and this development stands in contrast with a contemporaneous development on the SSPX front, where the Society has just now, in stiff-arming the latest overture from the Church, restated its objection to the notion of freedom of religion in society as being one of the supposed failings of Vatican 2.

By: ahem

ahem — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:06:36 +0000

Unfortunately for us all, Mr. George, you are utterly, and tragically, wrong. If the matter were solely one of religious freedom, your case might have merit. The only problem is that the forces behind the establishment of the mosque are connected to radical Islam. In point of fact, Islam has a very decided political component, of which, apparently, you are ignorant, and which it would be suicidal for us to ignore.

The problem with an open society is that its enemies can so easily abuse its ideals and institutions in order to undermine it, as has happened here.

Your victory is surely a phyrric one.