<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Catholic Church&#8217;s Finances</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/20/the-catholic-churchs-finances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/20/the-catholic-churchs-finances/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crowhill</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/20/the-catholic-churchs-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-69739</link>
		<dc:creator>Crowhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46503#comment-69739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The church should not have &quot;opaque finances.&quot; 

It&#039;s one thing to ask the faithful to trust the church on spiritual matters, where the church can at least make a claim that it has special insights / divine protection from error. 

The church can make no such claim about finances, so standard rules of prudence should apply. In this context that means the Catholic Church&#039;s finances should be open and audited by an independent entity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The church should not have &#8220;opaque finances.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to ask the faithful to trust the church on spiritual matters, where the church can at least make a claim that it has special insights / divine protection from error. </p>
<p>The church can make no such claim about finances, so standard rules of prudence should apply. In this context that means the Catholic Church&#8217;s finances should be open and audited by an independent entity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catholic Finances, Continued &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/20/the-catholic-churchs-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-69672</link>
		<dc:creator>Catholic Finances, Continued &#187; First Thoughts &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46503#comment-69672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on the Economist report about the Catholic Church&#8217;s finances in the U.S. (Matthew Schmitz highlighted the story earlier today.) Gray argues that the piece shows a &#8220;lack of understanding of what the Church is as an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Economist report about the Catholic Church&#8217;s finances in the U.S. (Matthew Schmitz highlighted the story earlier today.) Gray argues that the piece shows a &#8220;lack of understanding of what the Church is as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Melendez</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/20/the-catholic-churchs-finances/comment-page-1/#comment-69636</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Melendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46503#comment-69636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Economist&#039;s editors have already indicated they do not understand the Catholic Church in other articles. One, in particular, expressed surprise that the Pope believed in a &quot;personal God&quot;. A reader&#039;s letter, that they did publish to their credit, summed it nicely: &quot;Let me let you in on a little Vatican secret: the Pope is Catholic.&quot;

Given that, perhaps this attempt at objectivity is the best they can do and a decent contribution to what the Catholic Church needs to bear in mind at all levels. If only the editors didn&#039;t feel the need to compare the Church to a large corporate entity and had avoided the tendentious title.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Economist&#8217;s editors have already indicated they do not understand the Catholic Church in other articles. One, in particular, expressed surprise that the Pope believed in a &#8220;personal God&#8221;. A reader&#8217;s letter, that they did publish to their credit, summed it nicely: &#8220;Let me let you in on a little Vatican secret: the Pope is Catholic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that, perhaps this attempt at objectivity is the best they can do and a decent contribution to what the Catholic Church needs to bear in mind at all levels. If only the editors didn&#8217;t feel the need to compare the Church to a large corporate entity and had avoided the tendentious title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
