<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World&#8217;s Worst Art Restoration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RS</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70214</link>
		<dc:creator>RS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a member of my parish altar guild, I have often sighed to myself about how hard it is to change any physical part of the church. A torn and stained purificator will sit around for years before anyone dares insist it be properly disposed of. Gifts of (beautiful) religious art remain in the working sacristy, again for years, while the altar guild, vestry, and clergy discuss where to display them.

But now I have renewed respect for not letting little old church ladies do whatever they feel like.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of my parish altar guild, I have often sighed to myself about how hard it is to change any physical part of the church. A torn and stained purificator will sit around for years before anyone dares insist it be properly disposed of. Gifts of (beautiful) religious art remain in the working sacristy, again for years, while the altar guild, vestry, and clergy discuss where to display them.</p>
<p>But now I have renewed respect for not letting little old church ladies do whatever they feel like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Botolph</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70144</link>
		<dc:creator>Botolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was this woman perhaps a member of the &quot;Jesus Seminar&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this woman perhaps a member of the &#8220;Jesus Seminar&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brande</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70143</link>
		<dc:creator>Brande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I viewed this for the first time during the national nightly news last night and was shocked.  My comment reflects another aspect of our current times:  Why did she perceive it ok to work on the fresco?  People don&#039;t respect boundries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I viewed this for the first time during the national nightly news last night and was shocked.  My comment reflects another aspect of our current times:  Why did she perceive it ok to work on the fresco?  People don&#8217;t respect boundries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaime</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although awful and inept, Senora Gimenez&#039; effort is consistent with the aesthetic found in much contemporary &quot;art&quot;.  I would not be at all surprised to see this image on the walls of a Soho or Brooklyn gallery, or even gracing the cover of an upcoming Missalette.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although awful and inept, Senora Gimenez&#8217; effort is consistent with the aesthetic found in much contemporary &#8220;art&#8221;.  I would not be at all surprised to see this image on the walls of a Soho or Brooklyn gallery, or even gracing the cover of an upcoming Missalette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfm</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70079</link>
		<dc:creator>jfm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the original Jesus suffered.  In the restoration, we all suffer.  It&#039;s brilliant!  

Who said art should have visual appeal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the original Jesus suffered.  In the restoration, we all suffer.  It&#8217;s brilliant!  </p>
<p>Who said art should have visual appeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter S.</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70074</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 20:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is awful, but it&#039;s a little bit funny at the same time, just because it&#039;s so terrible. The simulated scrollwork at the bottom appears to curl in a direction that does not make physical sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awful, but it&#8217;s a little bit funny at the same time, just because it&#8217;s so terrible. The simulated scrollwork at the bottom appears to curl in a direction that does not make physical sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nickol</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/23/the-worlds-worst-art-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-70071</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nickol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46768#comment-70071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll say this about the &quot;restoration.&quot; I can hardly take my eyes off of it. I keep staring and staring at it and thinking, &quot;How in the world???&quot; I wonder what materials she used. Unless it was something that left the underlying painting intact and can simply be lifted off, it strikes me there is no way to do an authentic restoration now. There&#039;s very little left of the original. Even the basic shapes don&#039;t remain. What was she thinking???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say this about the &#8220;restoration.&#8221; I can hardly take my eyes off of it. I keep staring and staring at it and thinking, &#8220;How in the world???&#8221; I wonder what materials she used. Unless it was something that left the underlying painting intact and can simply be lifted off, it strikes me there is no way to do an authentic restoration now. There&#8217;s very little left of the original. Even the basic shapes don&#8217;t remain. What was she thinking???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
