<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Three Baptisms in P.T. Anderson&#8217;s &#8220;There Will Be Blood&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/the-three-baptisms-in-p-t-andersons-there-will-be-blood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/the-three-baptisms-in-p-t-andersons-there-will-be-blood/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARM</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/the-three-baptisms-in-p-t-andersons-there-will-be-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-70256</link>
		<dc:creator>ARM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46761#comment-70256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Great&quot;?  Seriously?  That&#039;s the only movie I&#039;ve ever left and asked for my money back.  Besides being evil, it was also, as Pete so justly observes, boring.  

Some of the plot devices could have been occasions for interesting psychological portraits - e.g. the adoption of the boy, the contrast of the two fanatics and their respective leaderships.  

But in fact they were boring, because the filmmakers were so locked into their own secularist and liberal pieties that it killed their moral imagination.

Imagine if they had dared to depict a businessman who was honest as well as grasping, or even capable of some natural affection.  Or if they could imagine a religious leader might actually be a believer rather than a conscious charlatan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great&#8221;?  Seriously?  That&#8217;s the only movie I&#8217;ve ever left and asked for my money back.  Besides being evil, it was also, as Pete so justly observes, boring.  </p>
<p>Some of the plot devices could have been occasions for interesting psychological portraits &#8211; e.g. the adoption of the boy, the contrast of the two fanatics and their respective leaderships.  </p>
<p>But in fact they were boring, because the filmmakers were so locked into their own secularist and liberal pieties that it killed their moral imagination.</p>
<p>Imagine if they had dared to depict a businessman who was honest as well as grasping, or even capable of some natural affection.  Or if they could imagine a religious leader might actually be a believer rather than a conscious charlatan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/the-three-baptisms-in-p-t-andersons-there-will-be-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-70222</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 01:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46761#comment-70222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my opinion, There will be Blood is a very long and boring movie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, There will be Blood is a very long and boring movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R. Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/08/24/the-three-baptisms-in-p-t-andersons-there-will-be-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-70201</link>
		<dc:creator>James R. Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=46761#comment-70201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll look forward to &quot;The Master as well.&quot; But for a moment you had me really going, thinking that perhaps it was a production of Bulgakov&#039;s &quot;The Master and Margarita.&quot; Not sure how the latter would translate to the screen, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look forward to &#8220;The Master as well.&#8221; But for a moment you had me really going, thinking that perhaps it was a production of Bulgakov&#8217;s &#8220;The Master and Margarita.&#8221; Not sure how the latter would translate to the screen, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
