<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Brooks on the Conservative Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/09/25/david-brooks-on-the-conservative-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/09/25/david-brooks-on-the-conservative-mind/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:42:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rejecting Epistemic Closure: Progressives for Conservatives to Read &#171; The Pietist Schoolman</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/09/25/david-brooks-on-the-conservative-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-75970</link>
		<dc:creator>Rejecting Epistemic Closure: Progressives for Conservatives to Read &#171; The Pietist Schoolman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=48427#comment-75970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Joseph Knippenberg of First Thoughts — which I had recommended in my Monday post — began his dismissive response to Brooks by labeling the Times columnist an &#8220;Erstwhile conservative (if I&#8217;m being [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Joseph Knippenberg of First Thoughts — which I had recommended in my Monday post — began his dismissive response to Brooks by labeling the Times columnist an &#8220;Erstwhile conservative (if I&#8217;m being [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe DeVet</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/09/25/david-brooks-on-the-conservative-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-75617</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe DeVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=48427#comment-75617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with the author that the illusion that economic conservatism has a higher profile just now because of pressing current circumstances.  We urgently need to excise the socialist cancer which debilitates our economy.  We also need to attract &quot;independent&quot; voters, who probably hold economic concerns as higher priorities, especially this year.

However, it&#039;s wrong to think of this as either/or.  Conservatism must embrace both aspects--social and economic--if it is to prevail.  Just try to back off from the pro-life stance, for example, and watch the decisive portion of the coalition which blessed us with Reagan, Gingrich, W, etc melt away and abandon you.  (Yes, W blessed us, at least because he saved us from--yuk!--Gore and Kerry!)

For myself, I am both.  Almost libertarian in economic attitudes, while staunchly Catholic in matters of life, marriage, family, etc.  (I would not have voted for Guliani!)  These tendencies inside me are not pulling me, now this way and now that, but my sense is that the social and economic conservatism that I hold reinforce and complement one another.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the author that the illusion that economic conservatism has a higher profile just now because of pressing current circumstances.  We urgently need to excise the socialist cancer which debilitates our economy.  We also need to attract &#8220;independent&#8221; voters, who probably hold economic concerns as higher priorities, especially this year.</p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s wrong to think of this as either/or.  Conservatism must embrace both aspects&#8211;social and economic&#8211;if it is to prevail.  Just try to back off from the pro-life stance, for example, and watch the decisive portion of the coalition which blessed us with Reagan, Gingrich, W, etc melt away and abandon you.  (Yes, W blessed us, at least because he saved us from&#8211;yuk!&#8211;Gore and Kerry!)</p>
<p>For myself, I am both.  Almost libertarian in economic attitudes, while staunchly Catholic in matters of life, marriage, family, etc.  (I would not have voted for Guliani!)  These tendencies inside me are not pulling me, now this way and now that, but my sense is that the social and economic conservatism that I hold reinforce and complement one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
