<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WEIRD Values</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ingles</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mary - &lt;blockquote&gt;Do you really intend to assert, with a straight face, that an unborn human baby is not human? What is it then? An oak? A dandelion?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A kidney is human &lt;i&gt;tissue&lt;/i&gt; - it isn&#039;t an oak or a dandelion, either - but isn&#039;t a human &lt;i&gt;being&lt;/i&gt;. The argument is about whether a blastocyst or fetus are human &lt;i&gt;beings&lt;/i&gt; or not.

You may well think the position that a conceptus isn&#039;t a human being is wrong, or even reprehensible. But if you want to convince someone of that, it will be most useful to address their &lt;i&gt;actual&lt;/i&gt; postition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>Do you really intend to assert, with a straight face, that an unborn human baby is not human? What is it then? An oak? A dandelion?</p></blockquote>
<p>A kidney is human <i>tissue</i> &#8211; it isn&#8217;t an oak or a dandelion, either &#8211; but isn&#8217;t a human <i>being</i>. The argument is about whether a blastocyst or fetus are human <i>beings</i> or not.</p>
<p>You may well think the position that a conceptus isn&#8217;t a human being is wrong, or even reprehensible. But if you want to convince someone of that, it will be most useful to address their <i>actual</i> postition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76946</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Mike: Certainly you have similar values, perhaps thinking that the human beings killed as embryos do not matter enough to merit concern?

Begging the question. You can’t simply assume your whole argument. I can just as well assert that dolphins are human beings (I hear that corporations are people), and criticize you for not treating dolphins as human beings.&quot;

Do you really intend to assert, with a straight face, that an unborn human baby is not human?  What is it then?  An oak?  A dandelion?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mike: Certainly you have similar values, perhaps thinking that the human beings killed as embryos do not matter enough to merit concern?</p>
<p>Begging the question. You can’t simply assume your whole argument. I can just as well assert that dolphins are human beings (I hear that corporations are people), and criticize you for not treating dolphins as human beings.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you really intend to assert, with a straight face, that an unborn human baby is not human?  What is it then?  An oak?  A dandelion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ingles</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76944</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Taylor - Religious people are always persecuting those who have a different faith from them.

Does that sound reasonable? No, because it&#039;s not true. &lt;i&gt;Some&lt;/i&gt; religious people do in fact do that - but not all. In many places, not even most. But &quot;it happens&quot;.

The thing is, making broad generalizations is easy but rarely (if ever) accurate. If you&#039;d just said &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; &quot;WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made&quot;, I wouldn&#039;t have made a point of it. I honestly haven&#039;t run into that, but I&#039;m willing to believe you have.

But without qualifications, your original statement isn&#039;t just insulting, it&#039;s unjust - as insulting, unjust and inaccurate as the first sentence of this comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Taylor &#8211; Religious people are always persecuting those who have a different faith from them.</p>
<p>Does that sound reasonable? No, because it&#8217;s not true. <i>Some</i> religious people do in fact do that &#8211; but not all. In many places, not even most. But &#8220;it happens&#8221;.</p>
<p>The thing is, making broad generalizations is easy but rarely (if ever) accurate. If you&#8217;d just said <i>some</i> &#8220;WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made&#8221;, I wouldn&#8217;t have made a point of it. I honestly haven&#8217;t run into that, but I&#8217;m willing to believe you have.</p>
<p>But without qualifications, your original statement isn&#8217;t just insulting, it&#8217;s unjust &#8211; as insulting, unjust and inaccurate as the first sentence of this comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76821</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or perhaps you have ran into more sensible WEIRD people Ray. But I have heard that one more times then I care to remember. It is usually some strawhacking &quot;You are advocating loyalty and respect for authority. Eichmann did also. Therefore you must be Eichmann.&quot; It is really not surprising; in a rush to avoid the temptation to take one virtue without balance people overcompensate. It happens all the time.&quot;

What is just as common, and more legitimate for WEIRD people is that a lot of them worry that group loyalty can lead to intellectual dishonor via the temptation to choose what the group says over what one thinks is true. That is a valid claim; the fact that there are so many balances is just one of the reasons why it is so hard to be a good person if you are inclined to try. Also WEIRD people when the concept of group loyalty is brought up have an image of screaming mobs.

I have met all this enough times to bear witness that it does happen. That does not mean that your WEIRD friends are like that. It means that it happens.

Finally Ray, and anyone really, as a side note, don&#039;t misunderstand the acronym. WEIRD does not mean Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic. It means a certain value system that tends to be held mainly by a faction of the above. A substantial portion of Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic people are non-WEIRD and have no intention of being WEIRD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or perhaps you have ran into more sensible WEIRD people Ray. But I have heard that one more times then I care to remember. It is usually some strawhacking &#8220;You are advocating loyalty and respect for authority. Eichmann did also. Therefore you must be Eichmann.&#8221; It is really not surprising; in a rush to avoid the temptation to take one virtue without balance people overcompensate. It happens all the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>What is just as common, and more legitimate for WEIRD people is that a lot of them worry that group loyalty can lead to intellectual dishonor via the temptation to choose what the group says over what one thinks is true. That is a valid claim; the fact that there are so many balances is just one of the reasons why it is so hard to be a good person if you are inclined to try. Also WEIRD people when the concept of group loyalty is brought up have an image of screaming mobs.</p>
<p>I have met all this enough times to bear witness that it does happen. That does not mean that your WEIRD friends are like that. It means that it happens.</p>
<p>Finally Ray, and anyone really, as a side note, don&#8217;t misunderstand the acronym. WEIRD does not mean Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic. It means a certain value system that tends to be held mainly by a faction of the above. A substantial portion of Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic people are non-WEIRD and have no intention of being WEIRD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ingles</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76802</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 13:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Taylor - &lt;blockquote&gt;It is almost considered a vice in fact: WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Guess I&#039;ve never run into someone WEIRD in my life, then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason Taylor &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>It is almost considered a vice in fact: WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made.</p></blockquote>
<p>Guess I&#8217;ve never run into someone WEIRD in my life, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76769</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In point of fact, Chuck your statement is a non-WEIRD one. WEIRD people don&#039;t concern themselves as much about &quot;we&quot; and &quot;them&quot; let alone what &quot;we can do to them&quot;. Group loyalty is simply not as high a value. It is almost considered a vice in fact: WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In point of fact, Chuck your statement is a non-WEIRD one. WEIRD people don&#8217;t concern themselves as much about &#8220;we&#8221; and &#8220;them&#8221; let alone what &#8220;we can do to them&#8221;. Group loyalty is simply not as high a value. It is almost considered a vice in fact: WEIRD people bring up reductio ad hitlerum whenever an appeal to group loyalty is made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76768</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck, most readers here are non-weird. If you read Haidt&#039;s works you will find that the essence of WEIRDness is confining morality to interpretations of justice and charity and ignoring other virtues. It is in essence a typical &quot;Chestertonian&quot; Heresy: taking one or two virtues and running them at the expense of others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck, most readers here are non-weird. If you read Haidt&#8217;s works you will find that the essence of WEIRDness is confining morality to interpretations of justice and charity and ignoring other virtues. It is in essence a typical &#8220;Chestertonian&#8221; Heresy: taking one or two virtues and running them at the expense of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76763</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spend too much time worrying about what non-WEIRD folks think.  Let them worry about what we can do to them in reprisal if they object to anything we do.  If we make the argument that morality is irrelevant, and only power matters, they will get the message.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We spend too much time worrying about what non-WEIRD folks think.  Let them worry about what we can do to them in reprisal if they object to anything we do.  If we make the argument that morality is irrelevant, and only power matters, they will get the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76730</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sanctity of persons as persons is a WEIRD value. The Sanctity of Diplomats is a non-WEIRD value(authority/respect).

Spartans definitely were not WEIRD. But when they killed a diplomat in a rage, not only did they regret it, they came to a conclusion that they were cursed by the gods and asked for volunteers to go to the Persian King&#039;s court and offer their lives.

The rioters haven&#039;t done that yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sanctity of persons as persons is a WEIRD value. The Sanctity of Diplomats is a non-WEIRD value(authority/respect).</p>
<p>Spartans definitely were not WEIRD. But when they killed a diplomat in a rage, not only did they regret it, they came to a conclusion that they were cursed by the gods and asked for volunteers to go to the Persian King&#8217;s court and offer their lives.</p>
<p>The rioters haven&#8217;t done that yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applying Haidt&#8217;s Moral Foundations Theory to responses to &#8220;The Innocence of Muslims&#8221; &#171; thereformedmind</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/10/weird-values/comment-page-1/#comment-76700</link>
		<dc:creator>Applying Haidt&#8217;s Moral Foundations Theory to responses to &#8220;The Innocence of Muslims&#8221; &#171; thereformedmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49106#comment-76700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] From Mark Movsesian: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Mark Movsesian: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
