<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blond v. Cameron; Or: How Do You Turn Localism Into a Governing Agenda?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/11/philip-blond-turns-on-cameron-or-how-do-you-make-localism-a-governing-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/11/philip-blond-turns-on-cameron-or-how-do-you-make-localism-a-governing-agenda/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Voce</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/11/philip-blond-turns-on-cameron-or-how-do-you-make-localism-a-governing-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-76796</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Voce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=48875#comment-76796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has always seemed to me that there is a fundamental paradox at the heart of the &quot;new localism&quot; which in the hands of an ideologically confused government simply became a lie. The big society, in any meaningful sense, is not synonymous with a smaller state. But in an attempt to make the austerity agenda more palatable, they have attempted to sell it as the big idea – a genuine alternative to the welfare state. This was the lie. Volunteerism and social enterprise cannot move in to the space created by a shrinking public sector without serious and strategic state intervention. This is anathema to the free-market worshipping, deficit-reduction fetishists who hold sway, and so the space remains unfilled, the big society becomes an embarrassing memory and the truth is revealed. Cuts are just cuts and they hurt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has always seemed to me that there is a fundamental paradox at the heart of the &#8220;new localism&#8221; which in the hands of an ideologically confused government simply became a lie. The big society, in any meaningful sense, is not synonymous with a smaller state. But in an attempt to make the austerity agenda more palatable, they have attempted to sell it as the big idea – a genuine alternative to the welfare state. This was the lie. Volunteerism and social enterprise cannot move in to the space created by a shrinking public sector without serious and strategic state intervention. This is anathema to the free-market worshipping, deficit-reduction fetishists who hold sway, and so the space remains unfilled, the big society becomes an embarrassing memory and the truth is revealed. Cuts are just cuts and they hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
