<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Paleo-Evangelicals&#8221; and American Civil Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: If You Are Still Thinking About This Election &#8211; A Testimony &#124; Article VI Blog &#124; John Schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-77751</link>
		<dc:creator>If You Are Still Thinking About This Election &#8211; A Testimony &#124; Article VI Blog &#124; John Schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49800#comment-77751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] grossly errant is wrong.  And finally there is the group we first learned of yesterday, the &#8220;Paleo-Evangelical&#8220;: In Kidd’s definition on the Anxious Bench blog, paleo-evangelicals are Evangelicals who [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grossly errant is wrong.  And finally there is the group we first learned of yesterday, the &#8220;Paleo-Evangelical&#8220;: In Kidd’s definition on the Anxious Bench blog, paleo-evangelicals are Evangelicals who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Are the Paleo Evangelicals?</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-77685</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Are the Paleo Evangelicals?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49800#comment-77685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] exist. I certainly would be close to this camp. Picking up on his ideas, Bart Gingrich and Anna Williams see paleos as being more prevalent among younger people.  I hope they are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exist. I certainly would be close to this camp. Picking up on his ideas, Bart Gingrich and Anna Williams see paleos as being more prevalent among younger people.  I hope they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Meador</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-77663</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Meador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49800#comment-77663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting discussion, though I do think that the paleo-evangelical label is misleading. The true faultline at this point in evangelical political discourse isn&#039;t religious right v. paleo-evangelical. It&#039;s two kingdom vs. transformationalist. But both those groups can agree that American exceptionalism is a generally unhelpful concept, that the GOP is pretty poor themselves at this point, etc. 

I raise that point b/c you could sit DG Hart and Peter Leithart down and ask them about exceptionalism or the GOP and they&#039;d probably sound very similar. But start fleshing out the specifics of how the church ought to relate to the state and those similarities will break down pretty quick, I suspect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion, though I do think that the paleo-evangelical label is misleading. The true faultline at this point in evangelical political discourse isn&#8217;t religious right v. paleo-evangelical. It&#8217;s two kingdom vs. transformationalist. But both those groups can agree that American exceptionalism is a generally unhelpful concept, that the GOP is pretty poor themselves at this point, etc. </p>
<p>I raise that point b/c you could sit DG Hart and Peter Leithart down and ask them about exceptionalism or the GOP and they&#8217;d probably sound very similar. But start fleshing out the specifics of how the church ought to relate to the state and those similarities will break down pretty quick, I suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/10/25/paleo-evangelicals-american-civil-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-77660</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=49800#comment-77660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every younger generation is “disenchanted” with the political system because they have a unrealistic view of what a “political” system can accomplish through “temporal” means instead of ‘spiritual” means - the changing of a person’s heart by Jesus.
The great thing about America is that you can be a Christian without interference by the government which allows for different “doctrinal” distinctions between religious groups but there is a basic Christianity that binds us together, e.g. Manhattan Declaration, for which we can have honest open discussions on what a government should do and what “we as Christians” should do.

Let’s have that discussion without rancor or the accusatory “that is not Christian” insult (e.g. immigration).

When a person compares our ability as Christians to function unimpeded by the government, that is a further example why this nation is great and why the current HHS mandate is insidious to all of us Christians.

America is not the hope of the world, Jesus is – but take into consideration we may be the vessels he uses here until he triumphant return.
Be strong, disenchant brings disillusionment which brings despair. We should not despair;  Jesus say be of good cheer for I have overcome this world. John 16:33.

God Bless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every younger generation is “disenchanted” with the political system because they have a unrealistic view of what a “political” system can accomplish through “temporal” means instead of ‘spiritual” means &#8211; the changing of a person’s heart by Jesus.<br />
The great thing about America is that you can be a Christian without interference by the government which allows for different “doctrinal” distinctions between religious groups but there is a basic Christianity that binds us together, e.g. Manhattan Declaration, for which we can have honest open discussions on what a government should do and what “we as Christians” should do.</p>
<p>Let’s have that discussion without rancor or the accusatory “that is not Christian” insult (e.g. immigration).</p>
<p>When a person compares our ability as Christians to function unimpeded by the government, that is a further example why this nation is great and why the current HHS mandate is insidious to all of us Christians.</p>
<p>America is not the hope of the world, Jesus is – but take into consideration we may be the vessels he uses here until he triumphant return.<br />
Be strong, disenchant brings disillusionment which brings despair. We should not despair;  Jesus say be of good cheer for I have overcome this world. John 16:33.</p>
<p>God Bless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
