It’s “new” in the sense of changed for English speakers (in the US and UK, I believe). But it’s not new in the sense of what the authentic wording of the mass has been since V II. It is, rather, a more faithful rendition of that mass. In some places the rendition we set aside a year ago was not just a loose translation, but actually tended to obscure or change certain doctrinal points. Good riddance.

For this reason I prefer to call what we now use the “restored translation.”