SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 9:23 AM

“I have said that it is not a common thing to meet an American who belongs to no denomination of Christian worship. This I think is so: but I would not wish to be taken as saying that religion on that account stands on a satisfactory footing in the States. Of all subjects of discussion, this is the most difficult. It is one as to which most of us feel that to some extent we must trust to our prejudices rather than our judgments. It is a matter on which we do not dare to rely implicitly on our own reasoning faculties, and therefore throw ourselves on the opinions of those whom we believe to have been better men and deeper thinkers than ourselves . . . .

“It is a part of [the American] system that religion shall be perfectly free, and that no man shall be in any way constrained in that matter. Consequently, the question of a man’s religion is regarded in a free-and-easy way. It is well, for instance, that a young lad should go somewhere on a Sunday; but a sermon is a sermon, and it does not much concern the lad’s father whether his son hear the discourse of a free-thinker in the music-hall, or the eloquent but lengthy outpouring of a preacher in a Methodist chapel. Everybody is bound to have a religion, but it does not much matter what it is.”

-Anthony Trollope, “North America”

via Marc DeGirolami

3 Comments

    jason taylor
    December 5th, 2012 | 9:34 am

    While it might be too optimistic a thought, could at least some be guided by honesty rather then indifference? I know I had myself withdrawn from membership of my Church recently because I thought there were to many potential doctrinal disaggreements for me to officially declare myself a member (it was a fairly small martyrdom I simply come to Church as a guest; I can even take Communion. I can’t vote though).

    There are other reasons for non-denominationalism besides indifference.

    Adam Murray
    December 5th, 2012 | 12:29 pm

    Jason, I think it depends on the object of your honesty. Is it “to thine own self” you’re being true? Bill Shakespeare knew there is only a thread of difference between being true to oneself and self-deception. As a result, ‘honesty’ becomes a very fickle virtue that often leads to the religion of self-worship. It seems to me, that is what Trollope is getting at here. The religion of American Indifferentism is synonymous with the religion of American Individualism.

    Bettering Trollope » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog
    December 6th, 2012 | 10:42 am

    [...] response to Matt’s post about Trollope, I thought I’d point out the observations of another 19th Century European visitor — “a [...]

=