The radical secularists are violent… siding with dictators in the middle east in the name of stability (and oil); etc.

Every President since the 1940′s was a radical secularist?

Amnesty International isn’t a secular organization?

I think maybe your classification scheme lacks a few categories…

Christian creationists, orthodox Catholics and Jews are not violent; but I know the extreme environmentalists, Hollywood actors, and as we’re recently seen in Michigan, union members need to be placed on the watch list.

(That’s a distinct question from how severe a problem it might be in this day and age, or whether a specific government agency would be the best way to handle such a problem.)

homeschooling site:lifesitenews.com

for stories about secular state harassment of those who want pass their own beliefs on to their children instead of letting the state indoctrinate them.

See also UNFPA Youth Conference Calls for Unfettered Abortion and Plenty of It

Here is an excerpt:

The final outcome document calls for legal abortion, and an end to all restrictions on abortion including waiting periods, parental consent, and age of consent. The “delegates” also called for comprehensive sexuality education including information on sexual orientation and gender identities free of religious intolerance. They want the decriminalization of sex work and government recognition of “constantly evolving” concepts of the family.

When will the Church mount an effort to preserve traditional values and the traditional understanding of the family that realistically has some chance of reversing the slide down the slippery slope to godless totalitarianism? Such an effort would require the Church to be much more outspoken on these matters to its own members than it has been in the past. What kind of world will our children and grandchildren have to work out their salvation in if the Church doesn’t ever address these matters in a realistic manner?

A bureaucrat’s dream come true if ever there was, for it is a formidable wedge to use against those groups whom have no need (or desire) to submit to the tenured oversight of mandarins.

many Muslims, and especially Muslim women, are manifesting their confidence in the Republic and proclaiming their adherence to its values.

The president of the Muslim women’s movement Ni Putes Ni Soumises [Neither Sluts nor Door-mats] Sihen Habchi, in a forceful attack on “multiculturalism” has demanded “No more justifications of our oppression in the name of the right to be different and of respect toward those who force us to bow our heads”

Rachida Dati, herself a Muslim and former French Minister of Justice told the National Assembly that “The Republic is alone capable of uniting men and women of different origins, colours and religions around the principles of tolerance, liberty, solidarity and laïcité making the Republic truly one and indivisible” Likewise, Fadela Amara, another Muslim and former Secretary of State for Urban Policies has declared that “For this generation, the crucial issues are laïcité, gender equality and gender desegregation, based upon living together in harmony throughout the world, and not only in France”

Anyone who knows France and the French press, across the political spectrum, will know that there is great concern about « communautarisme » by which they mean ethnic and religious solidarities and allegiances that threaten to override Republican unity. This concern is largely incomprehensible to Americans who have learned to embrace the realities of their multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society, but it is deeply rooted in French political culture, going back at least as far as Rousseau’s suspicion of particular interests that undermined the general will. Hence, the determination to keep the State and Civil Society, « l’espace public » and « l’espace privé » distinct and separate. Religious and cultural activities belong to « l’espace privé »

And that’s who the French were ready to have for President, and who belonged to the same Party that is in power now.

Then again, if Valls concentrated on French corrupt politician “extremists” instead of religious “extremists,” maybe there would not be enough jails in the world to hold them.