<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kalb&#8217;s Tyranny of Liberalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/kalbs-tyranny-of-liberalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/kalbs-tyranny-of-liberalism/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael PS</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/kalbs-tyranny-of-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-83285</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael PS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52965#comment-83285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberalism&#039;s hostility to &quot;communal and religious life&quot; is of long standing.

Lord Acton noted, &quot;It condemns, as a State within the State, every inner group and community, class or corporation, administering its own affairs; and, by proclaiming the abolition of privileges, it emancipates the subjects of every such authority in order to transfer them exclusively to its own.  It recognises liberty only in the individual, because it is only in the individual that liberty can be separated from authority, and the right of conditional obedience deprived of the security of a limited command.  Under its sway, therefore, every man may profess his own religion more or less freely; but his religion is not free to administer its own laws.  In other words, religious profession is free, but Church government is controlled.  And where ecclesiastical authority is restricted, religious liberty is virtually denied.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberalism&#8217;s hostility to &#8220;communal and religious life&#8221; is of long standing.</p>
<p>Lord Acton noted, &#8220;It condemns, as a State within the State, every inner group and community, class or corporation, administering its own affairs; and, by proclaiming the abolition of privileges, it emancipates the subjects of every such authority in order to transfer them exclusively to its own.  It recognises liberty only in the individual, because it is only in the individual that liberty can be separated from authority, and the right of conditional obedience deprived of the security of a limited command.  Under its sway, therefore, every man may profess his own religion more or less freely; but his religion is not free to administer its own laws.  In other words, religious profession is free, but Church government is controlled.  And where ecclesiastical authority is restricted, religious liberty is virtually denied.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/kalbs-tyranny-of-liberalism/comment-page-1/#comment-83280</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52965#comment-83280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cannot understand why anybody would describe contemporary liberalism in terms of freedom through rational means. The dominant ideology of today&#039;s liberalism is technocratic scientism, the idea that a harmonious society can be achieved by rejecting all metaphysical ideas and applying scientific rationality in order to eliminate inequality and bring well-being to the masses. Not only the liberal idea of rationality is badly  mutilated, but it radically opposes freedom, since it denies that in people there is any meta-empirical principle. If liberty is just liberty of the instincts, it is absolute slavery on those who can manipulate such instincts. And it makes difference if other views of humanity are tolerated &quot;in the private sphere.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot understand why anybody would describe contemporary liberalism in terms of freedom through rational means. The dominant ideology of today&#8217;s liberalism is technocratic scientism, the idea that a harmonious society can be achieved by rejecting all metaphysical ideas and applying scientific rationality in order to eliminate inequality and bring well-being to the masses. Not only the liberal idea of rationality is badly  mutilated, but it radically opposes freedom, since it denies that in people there is any meta-empirical principle. If liberty is just liberty of the instincts, it is absolute slavery on those who can manipulate such instincts. And it makes difference if other views of humanity are tolerated &#8220;in the private sphere.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
