<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The G.O.P. as (Not) a Club for Christians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micha Elyi</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83555</link>
		<dc:creator>Micha Elyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Nickol, Ayn Rand was not a conservative, neither as the word was understood in her lifetime nor as it is understood today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Nickol, Ayn Rand was not a conservative, neither as the word was understood in her lifetime nor as it is understood today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nickol</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83510</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nickol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; This does not mean that atheists can’t be conservative, but it is hard for me to imagine an atheist who does not respect religion could be conservative.&lt;/i&gt;

Fred,

What about Ayn Rand and her admirers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> This does not mean that atheists can’t be conservative, but it is hard for me to imagine an atheist who does not respect religion could be conservative.</i></p>
<p>Fred,</p>
<p>What about Ayn Rand and her admirers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83470</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very difficult situation. For many conservatives, me included, Christianity is fundamental to American conservatism. I don&#039;t believe Christian conservatives think that other religions have beliefs incompatible with conservatism. However, the virtue of religiosity is crucial. This does not mean that atheists can&#039;t be conservative, but it is hard for me to imagine an atheist who does not respect religion could be conservative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very difficult situation. For many conservatives, me included, Christianity is fundamental to American conservatism. I don&#8217;t believe Christian conservatives think that other religions have beliefs incompatible with conservatism. However, the virtue of religiosity is crucial. This does not mean that atheists can&#8217;t be conservative, but it is hard for me to imagine an atheist who does not respect religion could be conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEDNESDAY GOD &#38; CAESAR EXTRA &#124; Big Pulpit</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83433</link>
		<dc:creator>WEDNESDAY GOD &#38; CAESAR EXTRA &#124; Big Pulpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The G.O.P. as (Not) a Club for Christians &#8211; Joseph Knippenberg, First Thoughts [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The G.O.P. as (Not) a Club for Christians &#8211; Joseph Knippenberg, First Thoughts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy K. Warner</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83411</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy K. Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My local Republican meetings (in a rural area) begin with a prayer, invoking Jesus. When we had a Jewish speaker the old guy who said the prayer simply prayed to God, without anybody having made a policy. It just seems like good manners.

I do think inclusiveness is a problem with Republicans, but not necessarily based on bad motives. We don&#039;t see America as a collection of interest groups, but a place where everyone is welcome and now please become like us. The problem is defining &quot;like us.&quot; Since a Republican club is a political group, it should be based on politics: We want other people to adopt our political philosophy. But our politics is based on our religion, to some extent, so it&#039;s not as simple as it is for secular liberals. I think David&#039;s solution is a good one, but it takes some conscious thought to make our prayers inclusive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My local Republican meetings (in a rural area) begin with a prayer, invoking Jesus. When we had a Jewish speaker the old guy who said the prayer simply prayed to God, without anybody having made a policy. It just seems like good manners.</p>
<p>I do think inclusiveness is a problem with Republicans, but not necessarily based on bad motives. We don&#8217;t see America as a collection of interest groups, but a place where everyone is welcome and now please become like us. The problem is defining &#8220;like us.&#8221; Since a Republican club is a political group, it should be based on politics: We want other people to adopt our political philosophy. But our politics is based on our religion, to some extent, so it&#8217;s not as simple as it is for secular liberals. I think David&#8217;s solution is a good one, but it takes some conscious thought to make our prayers inclusive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Knippenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83310</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Knippenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Nickol,

First of all Christians don&#039;t have to move to Israel or Egypt.  Both countries already have long-standing &quot;indigenous&quot; Christian communities.  

Israel is a Jewish and democratic state that extends religious liberty to all and provides limited communal self-givernment with respect to matters of private law.  There are secular and religious parties in the Knesset.

Here&#039;s what the State Department has to say about Egypt:

http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2011/nea/192881.htm

&quot;The constitution and the Constitutional Declaration of 2011provide for freedom of belief and the practice of religious rites, but the government places restrictions on these rights in policy and practice, such as forbidding Muslims from converting to another religion. Islam is the official state religion, and Sharia (Islamic law) is the primary source of legislation....

&quot;Non-Muslim religious minorities officially recognized by the government, including most Christians, generally worshiped without harassment. However, Christians faced personal and collective discrimination, especially in government employment and the ability to build, renovate, and repair places of worship. The government also failed to redress laws relating to church renovation and construction. Members of the Baha’i Faith, which the government does not recognize, faced personal and collective discrimination. The government also sometimes arrested, detained, or harassed minority Muslim sects, converts from Islam to Christianity, and members of other religious groups whose beliefs or practices it deemed jeopardized communal harmony. Government authorities often refused to provide converts with new identity documents indicating their chosen faith.
 
&quot;The government used violence against demonstrators, including against mostly Coptic Christian demonstrators at the Maspiro radio and television building in Cairo in October, killing 25 persons and injuring approximately 330. On other occasions, through inaction, the government failed to prevent violence against Christians or stop the destruction of churches and religious minority-owned property. The government generally failed to investigate and prosecute effectively perpetrators of violence against Coptic Christians and continued to favor informal “reconciliation sessions,” which generally precluded criminal prosecution for crimes against Copts and contributed to a climate of impunity that encouraged further assaults.&quot;

Can we say that there&#039;s no analogy at least between the Christians in the Republican Party and the Muslim Brotherhood?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Nickol,</p>
<p>First of all Christians don&#8217;t have to move to Israel or Egypt.  Both countries already have long-standing &#8220;indigenous&#8221; Christian communities.  </p>
<p>Israel is a Jewish and democratic state that extends religious liberty to all and provides limited communal self-givernment with respect to matters of private law.  There are secular and religious parties in the Knesset.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what the State Department has to say about Egypt:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2011/nea/192881.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2011/nea/192881.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The constitution and the Constitutional Declaration of 2011provide for freedom of belief and the practice of religious rites, but the government places restrictions on these rights in policy and practice, such as forbidding Muslims from converting to another religion. Islam is the official state religion, and Sharia (Islamic law) is the primary source of legislation&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Non-Muslim religious minorities officially recognized by the government, including most Christians, generally worshiped without harassment. However, Christians faced personal and collective discrimination, especially in government employment and the ability to build, renovate, and repair places of worship. The government also failed to redress laws relating to church renovation and construction. Members of the Baha’i Faith, which the government does not recognize, faced personal and collective discrimination. The government also sometimes arrested, detained, or harassed minority Muslim sects, converts from Islam to Christianity, and members of other religious groups whose beliefs or practices it deemed jeopardized communal harmony. Government authorities often refused to provide converts with new identity documents indicating their chosen faith.</p>
<p>&#8220;The government used violence against demonstrators, including against mostly Coptic Christian demonstrators at the Maspiro radio and television building in Cairo in October, killing 25 persons and injuring approximately 330. On other occasions, through inaction, the government failed to prevent violence against Christians or stop the destruction of churches and religious minority-owned property. The government generally failed to investigate and prosecute effectively perpetrators of violence against Coptic Christians and continued to favor informal “reconciliation sessions,” which generally precluded criminal prosecution for crimes against Copts and contributed to a climate of impunity that encouraged further assaults.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can we say that there&#8217;s no analogy at least between the Christians in the Republican Party and the Muslim Brotherhood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Nickol</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83300</link>
		<dc:creator>David Nickol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;which is that it has no stomach to defend anything resembling a Christian moral order &lt;/i&gt;

RL,

I certainly don&#039;t go to the kind of Republican meetings that you or Mr. Goldberg do. (In fact, I wouldn&#039;t be caught dead at a Republican meeting!) But my impression of at least &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Republicans on this issue is that they take it for a fact that the United States is a Christian country, and if those of other religions somehow feel left out, what in the world do they expect being Jews or Muslims or whatever &lt;i&gt;in a Christian country?&lt;/i&gt; If Christians move to Egypt or Israel, they&#039;ll be minorities, too, and they&#039;ll have to lear to deal with it, just like non-Christians in our (Christian) country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>which is that it has no stomach to defend anything resembling a Christian moral order </i></p>
<p>RL,</p>
<p>I certainly don&#8217;t go to the kind of Republican meetings that you or Mr. Goldberg do. (In fact, I wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead at a Republican meeting!) But my impression of at least <i>some</i> Republicans on this issue is that they take it for a fact that the United States is a Christian country, and if those of other religions somehow feel left out, what in the world do they expect being Jews or Muslims or whatever <i>in a Christian country?</i> If Christians move to Egypt or Israel, they&#8217;ll be minorities, too, and they&#8217;ll have to lear to deal with it, just like non-Christians in our (Christian) country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2012/12/12/the-g-o-p-as-not-a-club-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-83295</link>
		<dc:creator>RL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=52939#comment-83295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No doubt Mr. Goldberg has been to many more Republican meetings than I have, and in a wider cross-section of the country, but I&#039;ve never heard anything stronger than mild deism at such a meeting, and usually we get no invocation at all.  I think the GOP also has the opposite problem, which is that it has no stomach to defend anything resembling a Christian moral order (preferring as it does the liberalism of a generation or two ago to the liberalism of today, and the slow destruction of the nation to the rapid destruction thereof), with the result that sensible people wonder why anyone would want to be associated with such a pathetic bunch of cringing losers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt Mr. Goldberg has been to many more Republican meetings than I have, and in a wider cross-section of the country, but I&#8217;ve never heard anything stronger than mild deism at such a meeting, and usually we get no invocation at all.  I think the GOP also has the opposite problem, which is that it has no stomach to defend anything resembling a Christian moral order (preferring as it does the liberalism of a generation or two ago to the liberalism of today, and the slow destruction of the nation to the rapid destruction thereof), with the result that sensible people wonder why anyone would want to be associated with such a pathetic bunch of cringing losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
