<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Destroying Things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/07/destroying-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/07/destroying-things/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Billingsley</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/07/destroying-things/comment-page-1/#comment-86015</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Billingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54779#comment-86015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I fail to see how the solution for one overblown article that is an exercise in artistic eisegesis (reading one&#039;s own thoughts/biases into a work of art) is another article with another exercise in eisegesis with different biases.  

The reason &quot;It&#039;s a Wonderful Life&quot; has enjoyed such a long shelf life (relatively speaking) is that it touches on some very universal themes of love, sacrifice, regret, redemption and community.  It is not, however, some sort of blank canvas to read one&#039;s issues toward or love of modern suburbia onto. And Deneen&#039;s attempt and Forster&#039;s reply are both rather pathetic attempts do just that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how the solution for one overblown article that is an exercise in artistic eisegesis (reading one&#8217;s own thoughts/biases into a work of art) is another article with another exercise in eisegesis with different biases.  </p>
<p>The reason &#8220;It&#8217;s a Wonderful Life&#8221; has enjoyed such a long shelf life (relatively speaking) is that it touches on some very universal themes of love, sacrifice, regret, redemption and community.  It is not, however, some sort of blank canvas to read one&#8217;s issues toward or love of modern suburbia onto. And Deneen&#8217;s attempt and Forster&#8217;s reply are both rather pathetic attempts do just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Z</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/07/destroying-things/comment-page-1/#comment-86010</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54779#comment-86010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both Deneen and Forster have an overblown confidence in the power of environmental forces on culture: Deneen exaggerating the importance of sidewalks and porches and attributing supernatural capacities to suburban developments, Forster assuming that the spatial autonomy of the single-family home is tantamount to liberation in every human sense of the term. Neither essay has much to do with the movie or with the character of George Bailey. Even Frank Capra couldn&#039;t make a protagonist as cardboard-thin and symbolic as Deneen and Forster&#039;s versions of Bailey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Deneen and Forster have an overblown confidence in the power of environmental forces on culture: Deneen exaggerating the importance of sidewalks and porches and attributing supernatural capacities to suburban developments, Forster assuming that the spatial autonomy of the single-family home is tantamount to liberation in every human sense of the term. Neither essay has much to do with the movie or with the character of George Bailey. Even Frank Capra couldn&#8217;t make a protagonist as cardboard-thin and symbolic as Deneen and Forster&#8217;s versions of Bailey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
