<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E.D. Hirsch on Shrinking the Achievement Gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael PS</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-87367</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael PS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=55684#comment-87367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the article, the author points out the use of words as &quot;chunking devices.&quot;

&quot;Suppose you put a single item into your working memory—say, “Pasteur.” So long as you hold in your long-term memory a lot of associations with that name, you don’t need to dredge them up and try to cram them into your working memory. The name serves as a brief proxy for whatever aspects will turn out to be needed to cope with your problem. The more readily available such proxies are for you, the better you will be at dealing with various problems. Extend this example to whole spheres of knowledge and experience, and you’ll realize that a large vocabulary is a powerful coping device that enhances one’s general cognitive ability.&quot;

Granted there are problems with the symbolic theory of language, but it is an explanation, of sorts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the article, the author points out the use of words as &#8220;chunking devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Suppose you put a single item into your working memory—say, “Pasteur.” So long as you hold in your long-term memory a lot of associations with that name, you don’t need to dredge them up and try to cram them into your working memory. The name serves as a brief proxy for whatever aspects will turn out to be needed to cope with your problem. The more readily available such proxies are for you, the better you will be at dealing with various problems. Extend this example to whole spheres of knowledge and experience, and you’ll realize that a large vocabulary is a powerful coping device that enhances one’s general cognitive ability.&#8221;</p>
<p>Granted there are problems with the symbolic theory of language, but it is an explanation, of sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret Lythgoe</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-87348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret Lythgoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=55684#comment-87348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recall a few years back Fr. Neuhaus, in his &quot;While we&#039;re at it&#039;&#039; section of FIRST THINGS, mention that he reads, (if my memory serves me) about 65 or so magazines/journals regularly. I certainly don&#039;t come anywhere close to this, I try to read a lot. And, I&#039;ve found through my own experience (and I think that this is confirmed experimentally), that reading many intelligent magazines (such as FIRST THINGS, THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW CRITERION, etc., ) one will help develop more words. But how do we convince people to stop watching silly TV and read more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall a few years back Fr. Neuhaus, in his &#8220;While we&#8217;re at it&#8221; section of FIRST THINGS, mention that he reads, (if my memory serves me) about 65 or so magazines/journals regularly. I certainly don&#8217;t come anywhere close to this, I try to read a lot. And, I&#8217;ve found through my own experience (and I think that this is confirmed experimentally), that reading many intelligent magazines (such as FIRST THINGS, THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS, THE NEW REPUBLIC, THE NEW CRITERION, etc., ) one will help develop more words. But how do we convince people to stop watching silly TV and read more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-87293</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=55684#comment-87293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[arty, read Nathaniel Peters&#039;s intro to the quote. He states causation. This sort of correlation has been noticed and debunked as causation before. Children from homes with more books perform better academically. That prompted some to advocate book subsidies before it was pointed out that educated parents who value education tend to have more books in the home and that the parents are the cause, not the books.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arty, read Nathaniel Peters&#8217;s intro to the quote. He states causation. This sort of correlation has been noticed and debunked as causation before. Children from homes with more books perform better academically. That prompted some to advocate book subsidies before it was pointed out that educated parents who value education tend to have more books in the home and that the parents are the cause, not the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arty</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-87257</link>
		<dc:creator>arty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=55684#comment-87257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No it isn&#039;t. There&#039;s no sense in the above text that that vocab is somehow the unique factor. You have to notice a correlation before you can notice a causation anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it isn&#8217;t. There&#8217;s no sense in the above text that that vocab is somehow the unique factor. You have to notice a correlation before you can notice a causation anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/17/e-d-hirsch-on-shrinking-the-achievement-gap/comment-page-1/#comment-87236</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=55684#comment-87236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A perfect example of correlation being confused for causation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perfect example of correlation being confused for causation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
