<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grammar Lesson of the Day: And</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLKrakauer</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/comment-page-1/#comment-87653</link>
		<dc:creator>PLKrakauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54721#comment-87653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And&quot; by definition is a conjunction.  Logically, the role of a conjunction is to connect two parts.  When one starts a sentence with a conjunction one is effectively trying connect it to a previous sentence or concept.  When the &quot;and&quot; provides the connective role in a new sentence, there is more likely an error in punctuation which separates the two sections of the compound sentence with a perriod rather than connecting them with a comma.  When the concept expressed in the new sentence is too distinct from that of the preceeding sentence to qualify for a compound structure, the errant &quot;and&quot; is more nearly serving the purpose of an interjection or something of the nature of &quot;so&quot;, &quot;hence&quot;, &quot;anyway&quot;, or &quot;well&quot;.  It is what it does.  If it doesn&#039;t conjunct, it&#039;s not a conjunction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And&#8221; by definition is a conjunction.  Logically, the role of a conjunction is to connect two parts.  When one starts a sentence with a conjunction one is effectively trying connect it to a previous sentence or concept.  When the &#8220;and&#8221; provides the connective role in a new sentence, there is more likely an error in punctuation which separates the two sections of the compound sentence with a perriod rather than connecting them with a comma.  When the concept expressed in the new sentence is too distinct from that of the preceeding sentence to qualify for a compound structure, the errant &#8220;and&#8221; is more nearly serving the purpose of an interjection or something of the nature of &#8220;so&#8221;, &#8220;hence&#8221;, &#8220;anyway&#8221;, or &#8220;well&#8221;.  It is what it does.  If it doesn&#8217;t conjunct, it&#8217;s not a conjunction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/comment-page-1/#comment-87597</link>
		<dc:creator>jason taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54721#comment-87597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the rules of gramatical rules is that they are for amateurs.  Professional rhetoricians know when to keep them and when to break them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the rules of gramatical rules is that they are for amateurs.  Professional rhetoricians know when to keep them and when to break them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pentamom</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/comment-page-1/#comment-87589</link>
		<dc:creator>pentamom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54721#comment-87589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off the main point, but I think notwithstanding is one of the most wonderful words in the English language. It&#039;s best used sparingly -- twice in a decade is probably the right limit for a fairly prolific professional writer. But there&#039;s just a strange beauty in that word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off the main point, but I think notwithstanding is one of the most wonderful words in the English language. It&#8217;s best used sparingly &#8212; twice in a decade is probably the right limit for a fairly prolific professional writer. But there&#8217;s just a strange beauty in that word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/comment-page-1/#comment-87564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54721#comment-87564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I can say is:  And why not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is:  And why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd wakt</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/01/20/grammar-lesson-of-the-day-and/comment-page-1/#comment-87554</link>
		<dc:creator>jd wakt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=54721#comment-87554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the movie &quot;Finding Forrester.&quot; i always loved this exchange. Seems on point.

Forrester: Paragraph three starts...with a conjunction, &quot;and.&quot; You should never start a sentence with a conjunction.
Jamal: Sure you can.
Forrester: No, it&#039;s a firm rule.
Jamal: No, it was a firm rule. Sometimes using a conjunction at the start of a sentence makes it stand out. And that may be what the writer&#039;s trying to do.
Forrester: And what is the risk?
Jamal: Well the risk is doing it too much. It&#039;s a distraction. And it could give your piece a run-on feeling. But for the most part, the rule on using &quot;and&quot; or &quot;but&quot; at the start of a sentence is pretty shaky. Even though it&#039;s still taught by too many professors. Some of the best writers have ignored that rule for years, including you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the movie &#8220;Finding Forrester.&#8221; i always loved this exchange. Seems on point.</p>
<p>Forrester: Paragraph three starts&#8230;with a conjunction, &#8220;and.&#8221; You should never start a sentence with a conjunction.<br />
Jamal: Sure you can.<br />
Forrester: No, it&#8217;s a firm rule.<br />
Jamal: No, it was a firm rule. Sometimes using a conjunction at the start of a sentence makes it stand out. And that may be what the writer&#8217;s trying to do.<br />
Forrester: And what is the risk?<br />
Jamal: Well the risk is doing it too much. It&#8217;s a distraction. And it could give your piece a run-on feeling. But for the most part, the rule on using &#8220;and&#8221; or &#8220;but&#8221; at the start of a sentence is pretty shaky. Even though it&#8217;s still taught by too many professors. Some of the best writers have ignored that rule for years, including you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
