http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/05/downton-abbey-the-source-critical-approach/ A First Things Blog Wed, 22 May 2013 01:44:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/05/downton-abbey-the-source-critical-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-92509 ronald helfrich Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:58:33 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=58621#comment-92509 And you forgot to mention the U document, the material that the editor sliced from Upstairs Downstairs and diced into so much of Downton Abbey.

]]> http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/05/downton-abbey-the-source-critical-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-92214 David T. Koyzis Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:55:04 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=58621#comment-92214 Let us not forget the screenplay writers of the 1942 film, Mrs. Miniver, from which Fellowes shamelessly borrowed in an early episode. Would they fall under the A, M or P source?

]]> http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/03/05/downton-abbey-the-source-critical-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-92213 Clement ng Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:02:12 +0000 http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/?p=58621#comment-92213 In faint honour of Julius Wellhausen, should we call this the AMP documentary hypothesis?

]]>