SUBSCRIBER LOGIN

Search
First Things

Loading
« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 3:00 PM

This is fun—Mark Mitchell analyzes a Sprint television commercial:

While it might be a mistake to make too much of an ad, it seems appropriate to “read” them as representing the current cultural vibe, for if nothing else, advertisers are keen students of what motivates their audiences. So what, then, does this ad tell us about ourselves? . . . “I have the right to be unlimited.” In our cultural moment, the idea of limits is an offense. Limits suggest that my desires can be thwarted or perhaps even that my desires should be thwarted. But who has a right to do that? By what authority—social, natural, or divine—can my desires be hemmed in, circumvented, and directed? If the miraculous can be delivered to us through technological innovation, there is little reason to believe that the miraculous itself is limited or even beyond human control.

Yes, yes, it’s just a thirty second spot, and not to seem like an English professor who’s made a career out of deconstructing the psychological subconsciousness of Victorian nursery rhymes, but there is something uncanny about this, and I think Mitchell is on to it.

He may be a bit off on the nod to the “miraculous” at the beginning—it seems more a way of getting audiences’ attention with a kind of religious invocation of awe (Hopkins’ “grandeur of God” meets Whitman’s “democratic vistas”?), and not simply bedazzlement by technology. But the overall tone and message—whether consciously finessed by a marketing department or the result of an ambient regurgitation of our popular discourse—does seem very at home amid claims of individual liberation as government-enforced right. As does the puzzling desire to “upload all of me.”

3 Comments

    paula ebert
    March 5th, 2013 | 5:51 pm

    This one bothers me, too. It is so linked to our “rights”. No one has the “right” to be unlimited – it is so much of the ME! It’s all about ME!

    Peter
    March 5th, 2013 | 9:24 pm

    If you realise that in fact you actually are limited, who are you going to sue? God?

    Jeff Hardy
    March 6th, 2013 | 3:36 pm

    My wife and I had strong, involuntary reactions when we recently saw this commercial. Sure it is just a commercial, but Wow! I have the right to be unlimited. It utterly erases the Creator/creature distinction that is in the middle of our proper self-understanding. And to Peter’s point, it does indicate that if there is God he is certainly holding out on us by restricting my right to be unlimited. It is the original case of the man keeping us down. I believe that is the gist of the argument that was compelling to Eve . . .

=