At Via Meadia , Walter Russell Mead has been doing a great job covering the controversy surrounding visits last week by top Japanese officials to the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo. Yasukuni is a Shinto shrine; in Shinto belief, it houses the souls of millions of people who died in the service of the Japanese Empire, including during World War II. Among the millions commemorated are approximately 1000 convicted war criminals, including wartime Prime Minister Hideki Tojo.
Japans neighbors, China and Korea, perceive official visits to the shrine as an outrageous insult and a sign that Japan has not fully repudiated the imperialism of its past. (In response to last weeks visits, China sent a fleet of patrol ships into Japanese territorial waters.) The latest controversy erupted when top officials in Prime Minister Shinzo Abes cabinet, as well more than 150 parliamentarians, visited the shrine for the annual Shinto Spring Ceremonythe largest official delegation in decades. In response to Chinese and Korean complaints, Abe doubled down, declaring in a parliamentary debate , Its only natural to honor the spirits of those who gave their lives for the country. Our ministers will not cave in to any threats. Abe doubtless feels buoyed by opinion polls showing that he has a 70% approval rating from the Japanese public.
Official participation in ceremonies at Yasukuni have been controversial inside Japan as well. The Japanese Constitution, adopted after the war, disestablished Shintoism and effected, in the words of the Japanese Supreme Court, the separation of state and religion. In fact, in 1997 the Supreme Court ruled that the government officials could not make financial contributions to Yasukuni for use in Shinto ceremonies. With respect to this months visits, the officials involved were careful to point out that they were participating only as private citizens, not government officials, but that explanation has not satisfied critics. It doesnt matter how or in what role Japanese leaders visit the Yasukuni shrine, a Chinese spokesman said. We feel it is in essence a denial of Japans history of militarist invasion. And Japanese legal scholar Keisuke Abe (no relation to the Prime Minister, I believe) argues in a symposium in the St. Johns Law Review that most Japanese wouldnt recognize the distinction, either. Whatever the purpose of a visit to the shrine, he writes, the general public is likely to consider it as the government giving special support to Shintoism, associated with ancestor worship.