MEMBER LOGIN


Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Icons & Curiosities
Archives

Categories

Monthly



Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 6:06 PM
Sally Thomas

In the combox for my last post, I mentioned that my children have begun planning not so much their Halloween costumes as their saint-characters for the All Saints bash at church.

That is to say, the girls have it all worked out. The teenager spent much of yesterday afternoon paging through Rosa Giorgi’s The Saints in Art looking for inspiration, and finally settled — well, “settled” is probably the wrong word, as we still have several weeks in which to change our minds sixty-two times — on Saint Ursula, chiefly because of her red hair. My dark-blue velour dress, my embroidered Iraqi wrap, a crown of blue beads, and hair streaming loose on the shoulders: wa-la, Saint Ursula.

Likewise the kindergartener was transformed into Saint Walburga via my white scarf — if you see a certain pattern to these costumes, well, now you know why I ever go shopping — with a white poncho pulled over it, plus a dark-blue skirt that used to be mine before migrating permanently to the teenager’s closet. I do not complain, mind you; I merely tell the story. Meanwhile, you and I both know that in reality St. Walburga’s headdress is not all white, but the kindergartener has taken the statue pictured left as her model, and it’s just been scraped down and repainted as you see it. We could dress her all in off-white, I suppose, and say that she is that particular image of St. Walburga, but I haven’t bought any off-white clothing for myself lately, if you see what I mean. Anyway, St. Walburga she is — today.

The boys’ criteria for sanctified costuming are as follows: preferably weapon-wielding, but above all, simple. Last year they were St. George and St. Michael, which satisfied the first requirement, but St. George’s mother had a heck of a time making wearable poster-board armor, and both he and she have agreed that maybe something in the toga line would be a good idea this year.

We could of course wear these same costumes for Halloween as well, but somehow it never works that way. The holidays aren’t a two-fer, but a double-header. The teenager has already declared that she wants to be Lucille Ball for Halloween — that handy red hair again — while everyone else remains undecided.

I’ll be writing more about Halloween as the day approaches, but in the meantime, I’ve gone a-googling, to see what might be out there under key-word umbrella of “religious costume.” The answer is: not that much, unless you want naughty, and let’s hope you don’t.

There are these, however; I’m especially enamored of the theologian. The theologian of whom I am enamored in real life honestly wants a hat like that to add to his academic regalia. Maybe I should point him this way, as these seem to be a good deal cheaper than the ones from Cambridge. These ones are available on this side of the Atlantic, and probably on shorter notice than the Cambridge ones are — as he discovered a month before college graduation last spring.

This rabbi costume, from CostumeCraze.com appears between a “saucy vinyl nun” outfit and a werewolf mask, which should tell you something about the company’s ethos. Hey, man, it’s all just scary funny stuff . . .

I’m really just passing over the “sexy Catholic/sexy biblical/sexy religious” entries, which predominate. For about two seconds I was curious about “sexy biblical” — maybe those prophets make some people swoon? — but nah. Not going there. Not even.

On the other hand: Hair of biblical proportions! Whoa!

The most fascinating site I’ve found, on the topic of religious costuming, is The Costumer’s Manifesto. The Costumer describes herself as “a Happy Existentialist,” with no personal investment in any sort of religious dress beyond its interest as costume; you’ll want to skip the “fetish” and “kinky” links. What she’s compiled, however, is a trove of background information related to religious clothing customs of all kinds, so if you’re looking for inspiration, you might find something off the beaten path here.

I’m out of time right now, but if you or anyone you know makes saints’ or other religious costumes for children (or adults), I’d love to add links here.

UPDATE:

Sewmelody’s Mother Teresa child costume explained


Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 8:30 AM
Sally Thomas

Tour this selection of religiously-themed Halloween candy at Belief.net.

And I’d be curious to find out:

1. Do you celebrate Halloween at all? Why or why not?

2. If you don’t, do you just ignore it, or do you do something alternative instead?

In the interest of transparency, we do do Halloween at our house, though All Saints is in my children’s estimation actually a lot more fun. Meanwhile, we have friends whose practices regarding this holiday are all over the spectrum. I’m not looking to take issue, just interested.


Monday, October 5, 2009, 1:51 PM
Sally Thomas

Friday, October 2, 2009, 2:40 PM
Sally Thomas

Tuesday we celebrated the Holy Archangels; today it’s our invisible guardians whom we feast.

Herewith, some stuff:

Okay. If you were going to buy wings for the Christmas pageant, you could go ahead and get them today. Not great art or theology or anything, but little kids like dressing up, and I can think of worse ways to mark the day than by “playing” it.

This, on the other hand, I think I might be afraid to put on.

Redsox vs. Angels . . . it’s kind of a stretch, but somebody might actually want these.

I don’t much like the conflation of angels with children — boy, if ever there were a disanalogy waiting to happen — but I do love Waldorf dolls.

A vintage First Communion holy card

Guardian Angel milagro

Rendered redundant?

Vintage Bob Dylan
The “Cute Interchangeable Things With Wings” Calendar 2010


A literalist interpretation

Not exactly what I had in mind

A misnomer: you don’t hear the sounds of an angel, just the heartbeat of someone who has one.


Thursday, October 1, 2009, 9:15 AM
Sally Thomas

I didn’t know it until I started googling around this morning, but right now the relics of Saint Therese of Lisieux are touring the United Kingdom. Today she’s at York Minster; more about the itinerary here.

Swine flu fears aside, if you’re in the neighborhood, go and say a prayer for us back here.

There is, by the way, a very odd comment in the combox for the swine flu article, in which somebody who describes himself as a “late priest” says that his mother (also late) cured herself of some ailment by drinking soup made from saints’ bones. I wonder whether she put them back into the reliquary afterwards, or buried them, or what. The whole episode seems peculiar. Naturally I’m perversely fascinated by it and am already building the latest in a series of award-winning unwritten novels around it. What award, you ask? Why the Lady Catherine de Bourgh
“I Would Have Been a Natural Proficient” award, of course.

But back to Saint Therese. If you can’t make it to York Minster, Plymouth, Birmingham, Cardiff, Liverpool, Salford, Lancaster, Middlesbrough, Leeds, Nottingham and Westminster Cathedrals, not to mention Wormwood Scrubs prison (presumably you wouldn’t visit there; she would be coming to you), you may choose to visit shrines in Rhode Island, Illinois, Alaska, and an Anglican-Use parish church in Kansas City.

Despite the rather sweety-sweet narratives of her childhood in the Catholic Children’s Treasure Box or who knows, maybe because of them — my children love Saint Therese. We have umpteen sets of homemade sacrifice beads floating about the house, which we use in sporadic bursts of enthusiasm before we lose them again. The beads are a good tactile mnemonic, though in our house sacrifices are apt to degenerate into acts of oppression, as in, “”I’m giving you this. I don’t care if you don’t want it. I don’t care if you don’t want it so much that you’re crying and going to tell on me. TAKE IT. And now I’m going to pull a bead, goody for me . . . ” Or else people want to interpret eating the last slice of cake as a noble act in the interest of the greater good, and pull a bead for that, too.

My teenager loved, and continues to love, The Story of a Soul, though some people come away from it with an unfortunate saccharine aftertaste. Laudem Gloriae offers a glimpse into the warrior saint.

You don’t have to be a Catholic to respond to this saint’s story with a greater private resolution to offer the smallest actions of your day to God as the gift of your heart, to make your thoughts, words and deeds cry, Holy, as Saint Gertrude puts it. I’m never very good at remembering this for more than five minutes, but I think I’ll get up from this desk now and try.

Saint Therese souvenirs, large and small:

A vintage statue from King Richard’s
Sacrifice beads, if you don’t have time to make your own
These little wooden folk-art dolls are rather fun. I feel better about them somehow than I do about the doll I wrote about here. This post dates from before the Great Website Launch, and the images have disappeared, but hopefully the links still work.


Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 11:56 PM
Sally Thomas

Wednesday, September 30, 2009, 9:38 AM
Sally Thomas

So, here’s what they suggest doing.

In the contrarian spirit of Saint Jerome, whose feast it was first, here are some alternative ideas:

Put a WWJDrive bumper sticker on your 15-passenger van.

Tell a girl that growing up to be a wife and mommy is an interesting and intellectually satisfying thing to do.

Buy a boy an AirSoft gun, some genuine lead soldiers, and a miniature Mass set.

Remind yourself that the entire world isn’t twenty-two years old, and that looking and acting your age is not a sign of dementia.

Admit that you don’t know who Jon and Kate are, much less care what they do.

Shop at Wal-Mart.

Drink some instant coffee, some Hawaiian Punch, and/or some jug wine.

Do something for the sole reason that your husband would like it.

Wear a pro-life t-shirt.

Admit that you hated reading Lolita.

Put a disposable diaper on that baby.

Wave a Confederate battle flag (it’s one way to get people to talk to you).

Stay married.

Sing “Onward, Christian Soldiers.”

Don’t work out.

This would also be a good day to recite the Divine Praises as a subversive gesture.

(With many thanks to my group of friends who’ve been sending around their own “alternative blasphemy” suggestions. This is my contribution to that conversation.)


Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 5:57 PM
Sally Thomas

The Anchoress offers a meditation by Pope St. Gregory the Great:

You should be aware that the word “angel” denotes a function rather than a nature. Those holy spirits of heaven have indeed always been spirits. They can only be called angels when they deliver some message. Moreover, those who deliver messages of lesser importance are called angels; and those who proclaim messages of supreme importance are called archangels.

Read the rest.

This makes me contemplate, among other things, our tendency to confer angelic status on those who have died. Jesus said that we will become as angels, not that we will be angels ourselves; if Saint Gregory is right, to be an angel is to be at once something far more and far less than a human being. As they, pure intelligences, have much that we don’t have, so also do we, being embodied, have much that they don’t.

We have, oddly enough — oddly, because it’s too easy not to think of it as a gift — the capacity for suffering. The angels, for all their brilliance and power, cannot enter into our sufferings, any more than they could enter into Christ’s on the Cross.

When we bear the Cross with the Lord, whether we take it upon ourselves, find it thrust upon us, or both, we meet Him in the power of His weakness, and the triumph of His humility.

I wouldn’t have thought about this so much, I don’t think, had I not been reading, this week, the testimony of a blogging acquaintance concerning the brief life of his daughter, Vivian, diagnosed in utero with anencephaly, born and received into Heaven this past week.

He writes,

Franciscan Sister Ilia Delio writes in her book, The Humility of God, “God’s tears glisten on the fragile human face, the flawed creature who stumbles through the world in search of goodness. God is with us and his glory radiates when we strive to love by bearing the wounds of love. The crucified Christ is risen and glorified. God’s tears are mixed with joy.”

My wife and I have felt and haven’t felt God’s presence in a way perhaps similar to the way Vivian has felt and hasn’t felt our presence. I don’t know how aware she was or to what extent her actions were more than involuntary reactions. Still, we have made ourselves present to her by suffering with her, and we have loved her by suffering with her. God has been present to us by suffering with us, and He has loved us by suffering with us. God’s tears glistened in Vivian’s fragile, bruised, beautiful baby face.

All of this is to be made, not an angel — whatever roads are open to them, this one isn’t — but a saint, a human saint. We call our Archangels saints: Saint Michael, Saint Gabriel, Saint Raphael. This is because they are holy, not because they have become so. That is, as they chose, so they were, and are. As we choose, so we become, in painful limping slow motion, with God’s help and theirs.

Kyle describes his baby daughter Vivian’s last moments as the end of a race, her breathing not pained, but labored as an athlete’s would be in the final few yards. Certainly the joy of the people who stand waiting at the finish line, as a beloved runner staggers home, is very great, but how much greater is the runner’s joy . . .

Still, today we commemorate those who cheer us, fight for us, and protect us as we run, as valiantly as we can, the race set before us.

Here we’re celebrating in a low-key way, with angel-hair pasta and angel-food cake.
(I thought that icon was pretty nifty, too)


Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 8:37 AM
Sally Thomas

Bought two posters depicting the Holy Trinity yesterday for my First Communion class. This first one, the “Old Testament Trinity Icon,” I know well and love. I especially love the idea of the Trinity’s quiet intervention, as mysterious guests, to set in motion a history which will culminate, as Christians believe, in the salvific coming of Christ.

I wondered, however, whether the symbolism would be a little too low-key — the circle of the table, the triangle formed by the three staffs of the travelers — for a group of second-graders to grasp readily. In particular I was concerned that they’d get the “Three Persons” part, but not the “One God” part. So I went looking for an image from sacred art which would spell that idea out a little more obviously. Here’s the second print I bought, the Holy Trinity of the “Austrian Masters.” I’d never seen this particular rendering before and don’t know much about it, but it had the kind of iconography I was looking for: the Three Persons superimposed on one another, occupying a single throne. I’d seen other images in which the three figures appear to wear one robe, but couldn’t find an affordable print to buy until I happened on this one.

At any rate, I hope they get here by the weekend so that I can put them up in the classroom for Sunday. My plan is to devote a wall to Heaven: the Holy Trinity surrounded by saints will be our project for All Saints.

Anyone else out there have a favorite image of the Trinity? I believe we discussed this in the comments of some earlier post, but I can’t now remember which one it was. Anyone else teaching Sunday School/CCD this year? Anyone else got good ideas I can crib?

Anyone? Anyone?


Monday, September 28, 2009, 8:44 AM
Sally Thomas
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »