<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IKEA and the Disposable Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/04/ikea-and-the-disposable-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/04/ikea-and-the-disposable-economy/</link>
	<description>A First Things Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:35:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Washington Planner &#187; Wednesday required reading 8/5/09</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/04/ikea-and-the-disposable-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>Washington Planner &#187; Wednesday required reading 8/5/09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1125#comment-6154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Poulos defends the disposable [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Poulos defends the disposable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cheeks</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/04/ikea-and-the-disposable-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6149</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cheeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1125#comment-6149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alas, another example of mobility misery. Something the porchers would solve with a stable existence on the farm where one sits on the porch in a stout, well-made, American chair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, another example of mobility misery. Something the porchers would solve with a stable existence on the farm where one sits on the porch in a stout, well-made, American chair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Floyd</title>
		<link>http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2009/08/04/ikea-and-the-disposable-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-6142</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/?p=1125#comment-6142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James -- It seems to me that all your propositions against disposible furniture are stronger than your self-responses to them.  Yes, what IF the art of furniture-making is lost?  Isn&#039;t it already at least &quot;misplaced&quot;?  If I have to go to an ANTIQUE store to get truly good chairs, then doesn&#039;t that mean there aren&#039;t enough truly good chairs being made or sold today?

I don&#039;t blame IKEA for the disposible mentality, but the reverse.  We would live better without the disposible mentality for any number of reasons.  Would we lose some mobility?  Perhaps, but we would also have a better reason to stay where we are.  And whose to say we can&#039;t make mobile furniture that is also fine furniture?

Like architecture, furniture is a profound indicator of our human self-image.  What kind of thing is worthy of cradling our bodies in work, rest, or sleep?  IKEA is the furniture of a utilitarian, to whom the word &quot;dignity&quot; is confusing or meaningless.  If it holds me off the ground, who cares what it looks like or what it&#039;s made of?  Can we afford (spiritually, I mean) to be utilitarians when (and because) we&#039;re young, poor, and mobile?  That expectation will have consequences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8212; It seems to me that all your propositions against disposible furniture are stronger than your self-responses to them.  Yes, what IF the art of furniture-making is lost?  Isn&#8217;t it already at least &#8220;misplaced&#8221;?  If I have to go to an ANTIQUE store to get truly good chairs, then doesn&#8217;t that mean there aren&#8217;t enough truly good chairs being made or sold today?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame IKEA for the disposible mentality, but the reverse.  We would live better without the disposible mentality for any number of reasons.  Would we lose some mobility?  Perhaps, but we would also have a better reason to stay where we are.  And whose to say we can&#8217;t make mobile furniture that is also fine furniture?</p>
<p>Like architecture, furniture is a profound indicator of our human self-image.  What kind of thing is worthy of cradling our bodies in work, rest, or sleep?  IKEA is the furniture of a utilitarian, to whom the word &#8220;dignity&#8221; is confusing or meaningless.  If it holds me off the ground, who cares what it looks like or what it&#8217;s made of?  Can we afford (spiritually, I mean) to be utilitarians when (and because) we&#8217;re young, poor, and mobile?  That expectation will have consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
