SUBSCRIBER LOGIN






Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS

Postmodern Conservative
Archive

Categories

Monthly


Masthead

Founding Editor
James Poulos

Contributing Blog Editors
James Ceaser
Ralph Hancock
Peter Lawler

Associate Bloggers
Samuel Goldman
Jonathan Jones
Jason Joseph
John Presnall
Carl Scott
Pete Spiliakos

Blogroll



« Previous  |Home|  Next »         

Saturday, August 22, 2009, 9:25 AM
Robert Cheeks

The wife and I have a Netflix deal where we get two movies, mail them back, and get two more. I don’t know who came up with the idea but surely the dude’s a millionaire…talk about convenient! However, in the spirit of complete disclosure you sometimes get a disc that is so used and abused that no machine on this planet could possibly play it!

So, I finally ordered Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto. I’d put it off for a while because Mel’s The Passion of the Christ is my favorite all-time film and I didn’t think he could best that and Mel’s been acting goofy again chasing around some long-legged girl and betraying his marriage vows, all of which set off my Puritan sensibilities. Mr. Gibson appears to have some spiritual pathologies to deal with and I really don’t want to judge the guy.

But I like Mel and I think he’s rather a film genius, and in watching Apocalypto that idea is reinforced!

In this film, Gibson purposefully examines human beings, and families, and the relationship of elders to younger clansmen in a primitive, non-Christian, context. In this case in the jungles of Central or South America where a small village is overrun by Aztec warriors looking for slaves to offer the grumpy Sun God. While the offerings were the males, the females were apparently used for chores and breeding, something of a short, nasty, and brutish existence awaited these unfortunates.

Rather amazingly Gibson, somehow, is able to take people barely clad and I mean butt-cheeks hanging out and breast jingling in the air and in a very short time make the viewer become comfortable with this nudity and concentrate on the storyline.

In his portrayal Gibson establishes the universal humanity of these primitive yet exquisite human beings. They aren’t dirty people living in squalor, they are loving and generous and kind to one another. They work together, love their children, and worship their gods. They have made a strong, vibrant, complex and successful human establishment. His sympathetic portrayal of these villagers who have learned to exist in a dangerous environment correctly locates the film’s trajectory as it explores the horrific exigencies of existence.

Gibson has that gift of creating villains who define the corrupt pathologies of our species, villains who are the most profound and complex perhaps in movie history and Apocalypto is no exception.

One final comment on Brother Gibson is his injection of a spiritual element in his films. The Passion of the Christ had the androgynous Demon Thing, that just fascinated me, and Apocalyto continues the tradition.

And, I should mention that there is a scene where one of the villagers is escaping from the Aztec city and runs over this hill where suddenly the ground turns gray. And, as he proceeds down the “hill” slipping and sliding, we see that the hill is comprised of the decapitated bodies of ALL those human beings that were being sacrificed to the Sun God…a hill of rotting, stinking flesh. I nearly blew dinner!

I did not know any of the actors in this film, yet the acting was absolutely brilliant, the storyline was outstanding, the historical references, ect all seemed to me to be spot on. I intend to buy a copy of this film (high praise indeed), it is on my top ten best films list.

9 Comments

    Peter Lawler
    August 22nd, 2009 | 2:12 pm

    This is in fact a masterpiece. It’s easy to begin by observing that it’s a refutation about Rousseau on relatively peaceful and uncomplicated “savages” and the idea that evil etc. develop over time. Human nobility and human cruelty are strange and wonderful wherever and whenever we exist. And if a movie ever displayed the true natural depths of “family values,” it’s this one. Thanks for getting us starting on Mel studies.

    Postmodern Conservative — A First Things Blog
    August 23rd, 2009 | 4:20 pm

    [...] more from the original source: Postmodern Conservative — A First Things Blog Share and [...]

    Alfredo Garcia
    August 24th, 2009 | 10:07 am

    The indians are Maya not Aztecs.
    This is an important detail as the movie aims at depicting the collapse of the great Maya civilization.

    The Anchoress — A First Things Blog
    August 24th, 2009 | 3:55 pm

    [...] of video: Robert Cheeks reviews Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto and desides he likes it a lot. I liked it very much, too, although it was not easy [...]

    Bill Parsons
    August 24th, 2009 | 8:14 pm

    I’m not sure what message, if any, that Gibson had in mind. It’s been said that the Mayan culture as depicted in the movie is a metaphor for modern life (and all its “isms”) and its impact on the family and the individual. Whatever the case, it’s a 2+ hour non-stop roller coaster ride of a movie. Maybe Gibson just wanted to prove to his critics in the movie establishment that he can tell any kind of story he wants without relying on dialog.

    Bob Cheeks
    August 25th, 2009 | 5:29 am

    Mr. Garcia, thanks for the helpful and necessary clarification/correction. Brother Parsons thank you for yet, another brilliant insight!

    Carl Scott
    August 25th, 2009 | 9:08 am

    A very fine film. Visually amazing, and generally, quite thought-provoking. An instance of what I call “robust multiculturalism,” where you’re immersed in a very foreign culture, and are allowed to see its ugly, even savage sides, just as you come to understand parts of its logic. Rare, because usually in film your very foreign cultures are given to you as full of earthy soulful profound types, whose profundity sounds, er, more than a bit familiar… But here, we have what feels like the real Maya, or as close as we’re ever going to get, mixed in some sense with a universal parable about civilization and human excess.

    Peter Lawler
    August 25th, 2009 | 9:14 am

    Robust multiculturalism means, of course, understanding a people as the understood themselves–finding the “universal parable” accessible to us all [about human nature] in their particular experience.

    Bob Cheeks
    August 25th, 2009 | 10:43 am

    Mel’s portrayal of evil never fails to amaze. In this instance I”m referring to the Mayan warrior who cut the throat of the hero’s father. Now, that dude was a GREAT actor; almost bought it at Wal-Mart but it’s at $14 and if I wait maybe it’ll go down to $9.
    RE: Mayan culture, if you’ve got a hill of rotting corpses anywhere near your water/food supply or where your kids play, your culture isn’t going to be around very long.


Leave a Comment

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact